this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
644 points (97.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

11540 readers
1744 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Reminds me that just recently I heard they equipped busses with automatic "AI assisted" detection in their lanes. In very little time they've issued 10k tickets, though.

https://laist.com/news/transportation/la-metro-bus-ai-cameras-transportation

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

....I can actually get behind that.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Sure, but you'll get a fine for being in the bus lane.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

They've had them on busses in London for years now. They seem to be highly effective. I'm not sure if they are fully automated, or driver triggered however. Either way, they have trained people that stopping or using a bus lane is a bad idea.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Oh look, a use of AI and surveillance I can actually get being.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We used to just call these "Automated", nowadays we called everything with slightly automation an "AI".

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Computer vision is AI and has been called as such for a long time, way before the current wave of AI/LLMs. You can call it whatever you want. An automaton that can sense the environment, read information and make decisions on it is a kind of AI.

[–] myotheraccount@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I'm just glad they are not calling random stuff "blockchain" anymore

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

A tool is a tool. Main problem are the tools using the tools, usually.