this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
847 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

7989 readers
2815 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 38 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

And here I thought The Great Depression started in 1929. I'm not saying tariffs in 1930 didn't make it worse, but they didn't cause it.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 1 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 55 minutes ago)

I would say that the Tarrifs are a further attack on the working class as they were back then. Another tool to consolidate capital.

The largest difference today is the financialization of our economy (basically meaning every company runs like a bank). This had been a method of consistently allowing the contradictions of capitalism to be delayed and passed off through layoffs and stock buybacks to further sustain the bubble of this system.

It's almost impressive at how well capitalism has adapted throughout the centuries to suck more and more away from the working class before it has to deal with a potential revolutionary "breaking point". It's definitely something Marx could have never predicted.

TLDR: I would not say that tarrifs are the cause of either of these events. I would say they are a tool of the ruling class to be used in times that capitalism hits a crisis. The cause is capitalisms contradictions itself. These extreme tarrifs are just a tool to attempt to deal with those contradictions.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 52 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah unregulated capitalist economy did that. Good thing we didn't deregulate the economy since then though.

/s

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 34 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

2008 happened for the exact same reasons as 1929, because some of the protections put in place because of 1929 had been rolled back many years before. It wasn't as deeply bad because (dare I say) the US had a reasonable executive branch very shortly after.

But none of those protections were reimplemented. Credit default swaps are still totally a thing, for example.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

The "reasonable executive branch" decided that bailing out Wall Street was a good idea instead of bailing out the people. Just more Reaganomics, which always leads to economic struggle.

There's a reason why nobody under the age of 40 (and also above the age of 40) has been able to afford a house since 2008.

Obama just looks reasonable compared to the disasters of Bush Jr. and Trump.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 17 hours ago

CDS markets are also, currently, right now, freaking the fuck out rofl.

Ive been saying this since Trump announced his tariff / deportation policies before he got elected:

Great Depression 2.0, with nukes and climate change this time!

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 22 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That's a misunderstanding of the causes. Now, admittedly there's a debate on this so what I will say is an opinion, but one that shows how the tariffs did cause the great depression.

The problem people have in understanding the great depression is the initial shock isn't the cause so much as the trigger to the cause which is the tariffs.

Had the tariffs not come into play, the stock sell off and subsequent deflation could have been resolved with simple monetary easing, which is what we do today. This would have simply been a recession and we would move on. However, the tariffs following the stock sell off is why it's the great depression and not just a simple recession.

In fairness, monetary easing policy didn't really come into play until after Brenton wood agreement. That said, it would have been the right solution during the onset of the great depression.

So you can't actually say that tariffs didn't cause the great depression as again had it not been for tariffs we would have pulled through.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

With that in mind, would monetary easing help us this time after the shock of tarrif-ing the hell out of everything?

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

No, the tariffs are actively preventing monetary easing. If you were wondering what the news about bond rates and the conflict between Bessent and Powell is about, it's because they can't ease.

At a core easing relies on borrowing money to fix the downturn. Usually, when a downturn happens, interest rates go down because there's less to invest in. If you can't get a 8% return on stocks, you buy bonds until bond returns go below 4% or so. Except, thanks to crazy man tariffs, no one trusts the bonds anymore. So USA can't ease.

I also want to note, this was clearly Bessents original plan. Hurt the economy with tariffs, then do easing and pull more money back into the American Treasury. But oops, no one trusts USA anymore...

*Edit: Lol, god damn this happens fast. Powell is talking about what I'm talking about here literally just now.

https://lemmy.ml/post/29763814?scrollToComments=true

So the inflation he's talking about is why they can't ease. Normally when stocks go down, bonds go up it's caused by deflation. People stop spending money so prices go down and thus, bond rates go down. But we're not seeing deflation, we're seeing inflation, which again is causing the inability to monetarily ease. It's just funny to me we were just talking about this and bam, there's a news article.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 2 points 45 minutes ago

Sweet jebus, you're not joking. That really was fast. Thanks for being ahead of the curve for us lonely souls on the Fediverse - even if it was only for a few hours or so. And thanks for answering my question.

This aligns strongly with some sentiment I've seen around here. That what we're really up against is just a cadre of goons that are laser-focused on short term greed, a very simple playbook, and little else. I say "goon" only because I'm at a loss for a word that means: "dangerous like a cornered-and-hungry predator, yet piloted by weaponized levels of stupidity."

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Things can have multiple causes spread out over time. The Great Depression didn't become Great until 1932 and the first causes were a flurry of bad borrowing and over-valuing of stock that started in the early 1920s.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

No, you're right. 1929 came before 1930. There's much to unpack on the subject, but Smoot-Hawley did not cause The Depression. Worsened? Maybe, probably? Sure.