this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
466 points (86.3% liked)

Uplifting News

14967 readers
546 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 130 points 2 days ago (5 children)

~~Tax~~ Eat the rich!

Here's the thing. Even if he lives up to this promise, it's still him deciding where that money should go, and it won't be towards long term support of social safety nets for the commoners. He should just have been paying his fair share of taxes all along and into the future.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 65 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Based on current spending, it will most likely be spent getting drinkable water to the majority of the world’s population.

I don’t like how he got his money, but he’s been reasonably responsible with it since his divorce.

That said, he has over $113b dollars. If he gives away 99% of it, he’ll still have over a billion dollars.

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

Behind the bastards has a good two parter on him. I wouldn't say he's been responsible with it.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 19 points 2 days ago

He's been buying up huge swathes of farm land in the middle of the country. Not everything he's doing has been philanthropy

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 12 points 2 days ago

There are books on him exposing how half of his charities are frauds. Given his past records humanity should be wary of putting this man anywhere near anything drinkable or useful

[–] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

...or paying his employees more.

Funny how we don't have a popular term for the portion of an employee's deserved wage that turns into "record shareholder profit."

Imagine if all corporations were required to put a line item on check stubs showing how much you made them.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Too knee jerk. Needs "tax" incorporated as it's so unpopular.

Employee value index?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Who do you think Bill Gates' employees are right now? Do you think he's still the CEO of Microsoft? Are you referring to the Gates Foundation? If so, have you got data on what they're paid?

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is him avoiding estate taxes, change my mind.

[–] NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How much would his estate taxes be vs giving up 99% of his fortune?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Bill Gates uses his "charity" to exert influence worldwide and demand stuff in return.

If this man was truly giving away his money then world hunger would have been solved by now.

He is the largest landowner in the US

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 9 points 2 days ago

Even on lemmy his marketing pr is successful

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What stuff has he demanded in return?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

He heaivily invests in vaccines and pharma companies. And he keeps the vaccines patented.

See also this great video https://youtu.be/i8w3qPwpzZA

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, what stuff has he demanded in return ?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

He holds the patents on the vaccines which he acquired using a "nonprofit".

Do you think Sam Altman is also graciously saving the world with his "nonprofit"?

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean if I want my next of kin/whoever to get my money, it's better to do it while alive when you can get creative with the accounting. Especially when you've got Gates money and setting up something like a nonprofit is relatively easy.

Once you're dead and you've got this lump declared assets you're trying to pass on that Uncle Sam will take up to like 40% of.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

If only there was some way to see what the non-profit was doing, some kind of third party auditor or something.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

While I'm all for taxing the rich more than the current system of not at all, I think in the long term it would be better to instigate or modify systems so that we don't get these exceedingly greedy people going unchecked in the first place. How about a cap on the ratio between the highest and the lowest paid employee in any organisation for a start? Boss wants a raise, everyone gets a raise.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think in the long term it would be better to instigate or modify systems so that we don’t get these exceedingly greedy people going unchecked in the first place.

Absolutely.

The problem is that we live in liberal-democracies [as in, a certain type of democracy] where systematic mass media bias and financial corruption of the political system are ingrained from the start. It's not merely coincidence that almost every country has ended up like this. It's the inevitable trend of capitalism, a system that rewards corruption and that can't be leashed without worker power.

The bottom line is that such reforms would be nice, and I support any viable effort at making them happen, but at the end of the day, we're asking the owning class to give themselves less money. And unless you have mass worker-class power to threaten them, their answer is going to be "no" with a dash of "protesting is now more illegal". Historically speaking, the owning class don't give up any serious concessions without going to violent war.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah but that’s communism, so no way it would’ve ever happened. The average American voter thinks they can become billionaires some day.

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does the word communism even have meaning any more, or is it just something to yell when confused people get confused?

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I know, I caught the silent /s at the end of your post :) You are referring to people who don’t use it sarcastically - does the word communism have meaning left when they use it?

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Honestly, it might just be creeping closer to "social". As in, concerning a society. Things like bike lanes and healthcare.

It means when the government helps people that aren't me or people I like, or fails to hurt the people I don't like.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Communism" like we ever had real communism.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Communism is a word with different legitimate meanings and it sound like this comment is conflating two of them.

  • The communist movement, guided by the various theories within Marxist schools of thought. [as you can see, there's a huge range of ideologies in this school of thought, and a few different ones have become ruling governments, and any claiming to be the one true 'real communism' are being arrogant and ignorant]

  • Communist society, a society with a socialist mode of production replacing the capitalist mode of production, which those theories are trying to achieve. This has not been accomplished by a post-industrial society.

[–] rikudou -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because it's a dream that would suffer the same fate that capitalism does.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm so glad we have you here to finally tell us how everything works. Thank god.

[–] rikudou 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you feel like this has been a meaningful addition to anything? Are you capable of discussing without attacking your opponents?

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. Thats an excellent question. Do you apply it sometime? 2. Do you think youre somehow entitled to spew nonsense and not be called out for it?
[–] rikudou 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm stating an opinion, you're the one screeching nonsense.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for dropping the facade. Now go back to your hole.

[–] rikudou 0 points 1 day ago

Are you a random word generator by any chance?