this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
95 points (78.8% liked)

Memes

50414 readers
650 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is all so wrong. First of all, most anarchist advocate for prefiguritive politics, or "building a new world within the shell of the old" which is why things like Food Not Bombs exists, along with many many other anarchist projects specifically aimed at building a stateless, moneyless, classes society. They don't NOT want to simply abolish the state completely overnight.

Anarchists have come up with a WHOLE lot of ways that a society could be run, and they generally don't think that there's a one size fits all solution that would work for everybody.

You haven't read a single thing about anarchism that didn't come from a Marxist source, have you?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The fact that anarchists can't agree on a unified course of action is a big part of the reason why all these different ways of running society that people have dreamed up remain firmly in the realm of fantasy.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are at least six feuding Marxist orgs where I live, I don't think this is a valid critique of anarchism.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, in initial stages you'll have many different orgs. This was the case during Russian revolution as well. However, eventually a single unified vanguard emerges and people get on the same page regarding how to move forward. There is no mechanism for creating a unified vanguard under anarchist approach where there is no central authority by design.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago