this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
579 points (97.7% liked)

science

18664 readers
264 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
m3t00@lemmy.world
Joleee@lemmy.world
laverabe@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social
laverabe@lemmy.zip
579
Is red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the opposite (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/science@lemmy.world
106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merrickal@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Strange that YTubers have to announce if they’re a sponsored video but sponsored scientists don’t.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Read the end of any research paper and it indicates any possible conflicts of interest. Youtube isn't a reliable source.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They usually disclose their funding in the journal article. Otherwise, this meta analysis wouldn't be possible.