this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
983 points (98.0% liked)

memes

16728 readers
2022 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

why should wealth explicitly affect the ruleset by which you play? freedom of the press is crucial to avoid facism, however politicians could get an exemption.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Elaborate on why politicians should be exempt

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they in some sense represent the nation, one orange piece of shit shouldn't be about to ruin the reputation without some punishment.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Well that’s about Trump, not politicians broadly. But if we assume that’s the issue across the board, is the problem that politicians are able to represent us with their words, or that politicians are able to escape consequences for their words?

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago

The core issue is clearly that money can be used to bypass rules.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago

why should wealth explicitly affect the ruleset by which you play? You are right, it shouldn't. That's why billionaires shouldn't be able to own newspapers.