this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
1538 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
70415 readers
3473 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This! Finally! This will make other execs scratch themselves behind the ears and consider their life choices. Fines for the company they work for won't, as these same execs just budget these fines into the crimes they're planning to commit.
Fuck these frauds, hope they stay in for years.
Also, continue doing this, jail all the execs that break the law.
Despite what the headline says, no execs went to jail. The two who were punished with jail terms were middle management.
Martin Winterkorn, the CEO, will probably avoid any serious consequences.
I only have cursory knowledge of this incident, but: It's possible that was the right outcome. A lot of middle managers do some heinous shit, and then report only positive news to upper management with a "Don't worry about it" attitude.
We all know there's also evil CEOs in the world as well, but maybe the investigation found this wasn't one of them. 'Course, maybe they were just better at keeping plausible deniability.
The Board had discussions about how to stonewall California. US prosecutors have filed charges against the CEO but Germany won’t extradite.
They are all guilty as fuck.
I mean, apart from the apparent guilt, do you think any country would simply hand over its prominent nationals? If there were a case against an US CEO in Germany, hell would freeze over before extradition.
The point is that the US has gathered enough evidence to get indictments against them. Germany has access to that same evidence and has very similar laws that were violated -- but has done basically nothing.
I understand the point, and for the record I also believe those responsible should be held accountable personally. The difficult thing is simply the international character of the crimes committed. If these things are illegal in Germany, perhaps they should be tried under German law and courts.
But I also recognise that’s probably not going to happen due to the people accused having too much (political/soft) power. It’s a real dilemma when we’re talking about white collar crime.
Say for example, I do something right now in my home country, which is illegal for me to do in, say Madagascar, but is legal where I live. The thing I’m doing, I’m doing from my office in my home country. The effect is in Madagascar - is it then reasonable for Madagascar to ask my home country for extradition?
It’s absolutely not the same as what’s happened, but I’m taking it to an extreme to make a point. International laws are really difficult, especially when extradition of nationals is at play… not to invalidate the fact that these people did something very wrong by the way!
Of course Germany won't extradite we don't extradite nationals to non-EU countries. It can even happen that we don't extradite Americans to the US because they can demonstrate that they're likely to face torture in the US, such as isolation cells.
The US really like their prisoners, don't they.
They demand extraditing of prisoners from other countries, but won't ever extradite to other countries themselves.
Yeah, the second one. It's the ones prepared to do shit like that who get promoted in the first place.
Damn, assassination for air pollution is new for me.
The rich choose to exert violence on everyone else daily. This is community defense.
Lying about emissions is violence? Like chemical warfare?
Profit over people is violence. If a single person is harmed by your lie, that is violence against humanity.
But they have to be rich, right? I’m interested in the criteria.
What about a nation that supports a company who produces goods that allow the company to make profit, and the production of the goods harms people’s lives (e.g. pollution or poor working conditions in the production country). Somebody should police that nation. Maybe bomb the nation?
In that case the people in charge of both the nation and the corporation need to be removed. The nation can redeem itself once the greed poisoned leaders are dealt with.
But if the citizens didn’t fund the company’s greed, they wouldn’t exist. Plenty of examples of things people don’t need that they continue to buy, and support unethical business operations leading to harm.
That's some capitalism = commerce bullshit. Capitalism only perverts commerce to its own end of allowing a single person to "own" everything. Commerce existed for over 10,000 years before capitalism existed, and the father of capitalism, Adam Smith, even said that once capitalism has achieved its goals, which we did in the late 1800s according to Adam Smith, that it would be absolutely imperative to transition to a more "socially equitable" [sic] and "sustainable" form of commerce under a direct democratic framework.
Try using some actual facts rather than feelings in your next reply, also actually read The Theory of Moral Sentiments, and Wealth of Nations. If you are actually literate, you should be able to plow through both texts in two two to three hour readings.
This comment is so pretentious and yet so dumb. Nice job. Capitalism only works if people are spending money. Fact. There’s no getting around that. If people elect to spend money on goods they don’t need from companies they know are harming people then they are responsible. Should they not be “Luigied?”
No facts, just bluster. You need to read the source material.
Capitalism has served its purpose. Adam Smith would be screaming for revolution. Commerce exists without capitalism. It's long since past time for capitalism to be relegated to the dustbin of history.
Also dumb means mute, not ignorant.
Apparently reading doesn’t make you smart or enable you to engage in meaningful discourse.
You should check out Antisocial, Borderline, Narcissistic and Histrionic Workbook by Daniel Fox
https://www.psychiatry.org/news-room/apa-blogs/what-is-narcissistic-personality-disorder
No meaningful discourse to be had with brainwashed capitalist scum.
Sounds about right