well, it only took 2 years to go from the cursed will smith eating spaghetti video to veo3 which can make completely lifelike videos with audio. so who knows what the future holds

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

cursed will smith eating spaghetti video

oh gods, why did I look it up

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The cursed Will Smith eating spaghetti wasn't the best video AI model available at the time, just what was available for consumers to run on their own hardware at the time. So while the rate of improvement in AI image/video generation is incredible, it's not quite as incredible as that viral video would suggest

[–] wischi@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But wouldn't you point still be true today that the best AI video models today would be the onces that are not available for consumers?

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 4 days ago

Probably is still true, but I've not been paying close attention to the AI market in the last couple of years. But the point I was trying to make was that it's an apples to oranges comparison

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hot take, today’s AI videos are cursed. Bring back will smith spaghetti. Those were the good old days

[–] wischi@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

There actually isn't really any doubt that AI (especially AGI) will surpass humans on all thinking tasks unless we have a mass extinction event first. But current LLMs are nowhere close to actual human intelligence.