this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
407 points (97.0% liked)

memes

15012 readers
3620 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] nomy@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)
[โ€“] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Argument from fallacy is the formal fallacy of analyzing an argument and inferring that, since it contains a fallacy, its conclusion must be false.
its conclusion must be false
false

Sorry, defenders of irrationality: calling out an invalid argument (without claiming that implies a false conclusion) is not argument from fallacy. When someone points out your argument is flawed, fix it. ๐Ÿ˜Ž

[โ€“] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Argument from authority (logic is an authority and we do not recognize its mandate to rule on this website)

[โ€“] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Good joke: irrational people on this website certainly don't recognize much.

An argument from authority is a form of argument in which the opinion of an authority figure (or figures) who lacks relevant expertise is used as evidence to support an argument.

Logic is the study of methods for evaluating whether the premises of an argument adequately support its conclusion.

Definition doesn't apply: logic isn't "an authority" capable of bearing "opinion" or "expertise".

[โ€“] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

That's certainly logically true, and as such, I cannot accept it ;-)

[โ€“] Speiser0@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's not how one should use voting on lemmy. If the conclusion happens to be right but the reasoning is faulty, it's still a bad post.

[โ€“] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Conversely, if the conclusion was wrong but it added value to the discussion, then it's still a good post.