this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
682 points (96.6% liked)

Science Memes

14752 readers
1184 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

For me the more important implication of Godel is that mathematics itself is countable and thus measure zero. No matter how much we do, the infinite majority of the unknown will still be left to explore... And that's just the math, not even talking about the dependent science (also measure zero). The unprovable stuff is just a tiny subset of this.

[โ€“] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 6 days ago

You know a lot more Maths than I do, and I agree with you (even if my thoughts in it all are more about having a fancy name to get people who claim both Positivism and "Maybe it's all a simulation man" to recognise the hypocrisy of that).

My whole life-data-mismatch thing is from similar discussions with positivists, as I think life and consciousness is a pretty easy area to show that it doesn't hold all the answers.

Back to the main point:
The idea that Maths is countable is pretty wild, and I'm gonna need to mull on it. Thanks for sharing.