this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1884 readers
97 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's sarcasm. The question asks for unwarranted precision and the response is a joke.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Imagining a guy who asks me a dumb question so I can let everyone know how I'd mock them with a joke answer.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Spot on, yeah. Although as pointed out just above, this wasn't actually Weizenbaum's position. But in an era of letters to the editor, perhaps using a little rhetorical trickery to preempt a two-month-long back and forth might be excusable. It's a strawman nonetheless; but this letter is a screed.

[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I suspect he got asked it a lot. There was a lot of interesting work going on back then but people basically didn't have any notion that there was a path from there to any kind of AGI. (In that respect they might've been somewhat more clued up than Altman.)

I think it's a natural thing to preemptively defend against the obvious counterpoint when you're railing against the thesis that current AI work isn't going to deliver on the "I".

[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Having said that, that this is the kind of thing Altman might say unironically speaks volumes. He really does have a trillion-dollar monorail to sell.

[–] nightsky@awful.systems 1 points 2 days ago

Ah, thanks, well my sarcasm detector isn't that good.