89
submitted 1 year ago by HKayn@dormi.zone to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MantidSys@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Do you think a "soulslike" is defined by being dark and gritty? I find it odd that you think the inclusion of anything cute or hopeful/friendly would be only a negative. Maybe your preferences are for dark and gritty only, but I assure you that many people enjoy other styles. There's a charm to there being hope in a dying world, isn't there?

Besides, I'd say most people define "soulslike" by their gameplay, not aesthetics. Maybe the "git gud" fragile-masculinity crowd needs their unforgiving combat system paired with a dark, 'masculine' atmosphere to fulfill their power fantasy, but again, I assure you that many other types of people enjoy those games - especially Elden Ring, which has much broader appeal than the previous souls games.

I'll wager you're a toxic "git gud" type that hinges their identity on these types of games, and that's why the idea of your sacred icon being blemished by comparison to Soulframe upsets you so much. I really can't see why else anyone would be this angry over a game not being to their preferences. If people enjoy something different than you, let them. :)

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Microtransaction fueled garbage is a blight on the consumer and I will always hope these greedy developers fail, aside from that the article itself is so poorly written I have to wonder if it was done by a bot.

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
89 points (90.8% liked)

Gaming

19727 readers
675 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS