this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
231 points (97.5% liked)

politics

23990 readers
3729 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Biden added: “Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn’t is ridiculous and false.”

God damn, so politically stupid to not realize that these political attacks works since he's still defending himself from these same political attacks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You are just gaslighting at this point.

The voters aren't different than they are. They didn't want to vote for genocide so they didn't. Harris didn't offer them another choice so they didn't show up.

That's her fault, and yes, her rightward shift is accelerationism. The defense of that as an approach to electoralism is also accelerationism.

And it fucking loses elections. Democratic voters aren't having it. They don't want right wing politics. They don't want a right wing Democratic party. They won't vote for it.

You have to decide between being an apologist for genocide or winning elections.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Gotta love how liberals have decided to call "I want less murder" now accelerationism.

They just parrot whatever some commenter said without ever checking what words mean.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm just constantly exhausted by having to reign this fantastical thinking in. Years of having to push back against this adolescent and mediocre drivel.

And we've made great progress. The narrative has truly shifted and people really have moved on their understanding that the Democrats and the manner in which they conduct themselves are fundamental to why fascism continues to accelerate. Not all of them, but its way better than where we were a year ago.

But jfc, its tiring.

[–] midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Once again, here we are though, in a paradise of your own creation. Isn't it great? Aren't you happy with the state of things? Fascism is in full bloom, access to the polls is shrinking, genocide has sped up. Socialism must be right around the corner, right? Looks like your vote against Harris is going to save the world after all.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

genocide has sped up.

Check your murder numbers, so far thats just not true. You might be right long term, but the vast bulk of the genocide of civilians based on their ehtnicity happened on Bidens watch. And your couching those words the way you did shows you are in denial about it. You think "our side" must be "the good guys" where the 'slightly better' outcomes happen.

All dem voters were betrayed and thats a big part of why the lefty Dem voters are extremely angry and are revolting against centrist leadership and the fundamentals of our party setup. They have very good reasons to be angry. It would be a good start for the party to acknowledge that betrayal, apologize, and state unequivocally they wont do that again. Until that happens this wound will sit and fester, and more elections that should be slam dunks will be lost-- assuming we have any more.

You cant just dust over genocide and pretend its not there. Enough of us are well past helping you pretend thats the case. Thats my definition of accelerationism, and its not up for your approval.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Who is living the fiction here?

Democrats litterally did precisely what you've outlined here. They lost the election. The failed to engage with their voters on their voters terms.

They lost. Your approach loses. It's a losing strategy. You can't move an electorate. You can move a candidate. Expecting voters to change to accept a bad candidate loses elections. Stop fucking advocating for it.