this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
1768 points (97.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

8006 readers
4295 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] smol_beans@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (8 children)

The people that drop bombs on civilians are responsible for killing civilians.
The people who starve a population are responsible for starving a population.

IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE JUSTIFICATION IS

[–] Allah@infosec.pub -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

wrong it was axis fault for militarizing it in the first place, by not bombing it they would have incentivized the practice

THE FAULT IS ON AXIS NOT ALLIES

[–] smol_beans@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Were the nazis justified in destroying the Warsaw ghetto because Jewish groups had militarized it?

[–] Allah@infosec.pub -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

of course not because they were agressor in invading poland which had a goverment of it's own

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

You're not even trying to be consistent

[–] smol_beans@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are you saying that people have the right to militarize parts of their own country? And doing that doesn't justify murdering civilians? Sounds like you've switched to my side

[–] Allah@infosec.pub 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i am saying germans were agressors in ww2 that's why it was bad

[–] smol_beans@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

International Law doesn't make that distinction. The only reason you make that distinction is because you want to justify killing some civilians

[–] Allah@infosec.pub 0 points 2 days ago

i am confused, i mean isn't reducing civillian casualties good? Sounds like you’ve switched to my side

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)