this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
535 points (89.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

12046 readers
210 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This was a Critical Mass event, which is why the bicyclists are taking up all of the street as a way to reclaim the streets and protest the lack of safety for riders under usual conditions. It's not legal, but protests are never useful if they're fully legal now, are they.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The bikes in the oncoming lane are safe? C'mon what kind of joke. Blocking streets is one thing but they're actually moving forward straight on in oncoming traffic, in what world is that safe?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca -2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Since when are cars the only one entitled to use the road?

Edit: Bunch of fucking idiots who don't understand roads or protests getting all pissy because they were told they don't own the road.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Cars are also not safe when driving into oncoming traffic. Thought that was obvious.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Huh, seen as how the driver here was unsafe, it appears you are intentionally misinterpreting what I have posted.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Seeing as I'm talking about the BIKES LITERALLY RIDING AGAINST THE DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC, I think you're missing that that's what I'm talking about.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

in what world is that safe?

In the world of every parade that has been performed in every major city for the last two centuries at least.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ahhh, I'll remember to drive right on into that parade next time they've moved off closed streets.

Nothing you say will stop the parts of this protest that are riding into oncoming traffic as safe. They clearly didn't get coming traffic directed away.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The unsafe thing here is the driver who insisted on dangerous driving. Motorists have an obligation to not cause harm regardless of what others are doing.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

If I threw you into oncoming traffic would that be unsafe? Simple answer, yes. That's literally the only point I'm making. A protest being good doesn't make the handful of troublemakers suddenly perfectly safe. They're on the wrong side of the road.Travel direction does not change because you're on a bike. Done. That's it. Unsafe behaviors by some of the cyclists.