this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
1131 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

15468 readers
2346 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 81 points 3 weeks ago (24 children)

Yes, in theory. It's extremely dangerous and absurdly expensive. It also would only address the microplastics currently in the bloodstream - the ones already embedded into organ tissues wouldn't be reliably filtered out this way.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 49 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

When it comes to PFAS contamination, people have been having decent results by simply donating blood often. Getting it out of the system via blood does help to reduce overall levels in your body.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 30 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

Donating plasma works even better. They extract a larger volume of fluids per session, twice a week instead of once every 8 weeks.

Don't worry about the recipient: If you are donating plasma regularly, your PFAS levels will be well below average.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 14 points 3 weeks ago

A woman having a child is the biggest reduction. Make of that what you will. I sure hope the placenta, and not the baby, is getting the remainder. But I am guessing both.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)