Technology

39151 readers

480 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

169

Telegram is indistinguishable from an FSB honeypot (rys.io)

submitted 3 days ago by rysiek@szmer.info to c/technology@beehaw.org

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Investigation by investigative journalism outlet IStories (EN version by OCCRP) shows that Telegram uses a single, FSB-linked company as their infrastructure provider globally.

Telegram's MTProto protocol also requires a cleartext identifier to be prepended to all client-server messages.

Combined, these two choices by Telegram make it into a surveillance tool.

I am quoted in the IStories story. I also did packet captures, and I dive into the nitty-gritty technical details on my blog.

Packet captures and MTProto deobfuscation library I wrote linked therein so that others can retrace my steps and check my work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Soatok@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which is more toxic?

The one that contains the most aggression.

Aggression isn't toxicity. The logical consequence of your stance is negative peace, and broken stairs.

Do most of those strangers know that you are receiving hundreds of requests? They’re strangers, so I’m betting on no.

Sure they do, because I tell them. The screenshot you posted is proof that I inform them.

The rest of this is needless language policing.

[–] arsCynic@beehaw.org 0 points 1 day ago

Aggression isn’t toxicity.

Subjective. “A toxic person is anyone whose behavior upsets you and adds negativity to your life.”
Asking a simple question and out of the blue getting a response intermixed with full caps and "fucking" would be enough to add negativity to many if not most people's lives. Also the unyielding need to defend one's doing so doesn't help to convey the converse.

Do most of those strangers know that you are receiving hundreds of requests? They’re strangers, so I’m betting on no.

Sure they do, because I tell them. The screenshot you posted is proof that I inform them.

You "inform" them afterwards, therefore they didn't know.

The rest of this is needless language policing.

Not sure what the definition of "language policing" is, but welcome to the Internet. You're free to be crude or toxic while others are free to point out it out, which is rarely needless.