this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
870 points (97.7% liked)

science

19464 readers
1701 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: Changed to a non-plagerizing link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

We have work from home, i have gone to the office twice this year. But it is true it didn't work for everyone. Some left because of isolation factor, some fired because without anyone watching they just could not self motivate. In some case in-office meetings are way more productive, and you get those moments when a coworker overhears your convo and chimes in with something relevent that you would never have connection on in WFH

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

"Isolation factor" = you talk to people all day and don't actually do anything productive

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

While there are a few that work better in an office, the overwhelming majority work better at home. Why should we force everyone to suffer for the handful of folks who can't self-motivate at home? We don't bend over backwards to cater to people who say, have auditory issues that make working in a crowded open-plan office debilitating. We tell those folks to go die in a fire if they can't handle an office environment. Plenty of people can't work in an office, but that was never been seen as an argument to get rid of offices.