this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
558 points (98.4% liked)

AntiTrumpAlliance

825 readers
1360 users here now

About

An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.

Rules

-No pro-Trump posts or comments

-No off topic posts

-Be civil

-No trolling

-Follow Lemmy terms of service

Social Media

Discord

Reddit

Other Communities

!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world

!antifascism@midwest.social

!politicus@kbin.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 81 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We live in a gerontocracy, of course our leaders are going to be suffering from cognitive decline.

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 19 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

The world would be so much better off if you just couldn't be elected after a certain age.

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 8 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Hypocrisy is the conservative way, though. The Canadian conservative party leader (but not actually an MP) got into politics saying if he were Prime Minister, he would enact a two-term limit (8 years) for all MPs.

He was an MP for 25 years until he lost his seat this spring. Ironically, one of his campaign slogans was 'vote for change'. Upon the electorate voting for the change of their representative and him losing his seat, he then went to Alberta to steal another conservative MP's seat, while also continuing to reside in the mansion for the official Leader of the Opposition in Parliament.

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

Poiluevre? Wow I didn't know that.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

Good old Mr. Verb the Noun

[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 1 points 12 hours ago

They should index it to when you can draw social security.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

45!

... no, wait, fuck 45! 46!

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Well I guess I got one, maybe 2 elections to get a small time gov job lol. But I feel like voting should be cut off at 70 as well. There's just too many things to go wrong with that, meaning "ok grandma it's all filled out, just sign here" or old folks homes and stuff. We would have to enshrine SSA, and Medicare/Medicaid to protect them from attacks on benefits, but people that close to death shouldn't be forcing their ancient views on society moving forward. It really doesn't matter here though. We're not getting another election, not without a fight.

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

I meant getting elected. As for old people voting, you have a point, but if old people's views don't matter at all, then you can easily imagine a world where policy doesn't care about them, which might be dangerous.

I just wish we had fewer old people. It sounds like I'm arguing for a purge... But I just mean I wish our birth rates were stable instead of going all boom-and-bust.

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 3 points 23 hours ago

Would be nice if we could mandate highly invasive and frequent cognition tests for our leaders past retirement age. Like, "surprise exam ya haggard bitch, pass this or you're out with no pension or benefits!" Ideally conducted by some 3 agency's door kicker team at 3AM on a Saturday, every Saturday.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 23 hours ago

I think we can all agree that it should be steeper, going forward. Precipitously so, frankly.