this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
419 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

71623 readers
3752 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The legal basis is someone with standing would have to sue him over it. Tiktokm certainly isn't going to and Congress... Well.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe Elmo could, now that they broke up. He could argue that TikTok existing makes Twitter's videos less popular.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Hard to have standing over a third party not doing something to someone else that would hurt them to maybe(key point here) help you. It's possible to argue yourself there but the bar is incredibly high. If you can't assign direct provable causation and redress, you're SOL.

It's kind of like how nobody really could challenge DACA in the courts from the Republican side because all the harms they cited were hypothetical.