188
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone -1 points 1 year ago

It's actually the opposite: sport is often the only realistic path out of systemic poverty for young people.

[-] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It doesn't seem that realistic if you need to perform in the top 1% among all your poverty stricken competitors. There's a finite number of places for successful athletes.

[-] T156@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Especially when the people with financial resources will usually have a better chance of making it for one reason or another.

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Of course, but it is a career path where a young person's socioeconomic and cultural background is less likely to affect their chances of earning a wage that can take them and their families out of poverty.

I think some of you have a very privileged view of life. Go listen to footballers from Brazil talk about their experiences, for example. Or if you want something closer to home, listen to Indigenous AFL players talk about the opportunity sport provided them and their families.

[-] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You're missing my point I think.

Sure, a not insignificant number of sports stars have a background that's considered lower class, but the number of people living below that poverty line that will become sports stars is so low I'm not even sure how many zeros go between 0.[...]1%

Even if all of those people were top class athletes, there's only room in the sports world for a few hundred of them at most.

It's not a realistic career path, it's a lottery that requires high level athletic skill.

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

No, I understand your point - it's not like you are offering a particularly deep insight here.

The problem is that you are taking my original comment too literally. I am not arguing that it is a realistic career path in terms of overall success rates. I am saying that, relative to many other career paths in which these people face massive systemic and social roadblocks, sport is the only realistic option to escape poverty.

[-] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I see, my apologies.

I thought you were trying to say it was a realistic way for them to escape poverty when you said it was the only realistic way to escape poverty.

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago

But again - it’s the 1% that made it there. Only ~450 players are in the NRL. Many of them earn the minimum allowed of 100k still, and their careers average like 3 years. That’s the 1%.

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

sport is often the only realistic path out of systemic poverty for young people.

The number of people that can make a living from sport is miniscule. It's not a realistic path to strive for. You've got almost as much chance of winning the lottery.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
188 points (97.5% liked)

Australia

3579 readers
33 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS