this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
94 points (98.0% liked)

LEGO

369 readers
29 users here now

A place to discuss Lego news, ask questions, share MOCs, and more!

Community Definitions:

[SEC] = Someone Else’s Creation

[MOC] = My Own Creation

Rules

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Olap@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Call me old fashioned but Lego has too many set specific parts. I prefer the older set for actual play

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

yeah there used to be a difference between Lego and just a 3d puzzle

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah. I can just buy a model kit if I want something that specific. And that's way cheaper than Lego these days too.

[–] kusttra@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm confused - to which parts in the new set are you referring? Looking at the parts list from the instructions booklet, the only "set specific parts" I'm seeing are those with printing. And I thought we all agreed that more printing is better than more stickers.

https://www.lego.com/en-us/service/building-instructions/77242

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It looks like there are still plenty of stickers though

[–] kusttra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Very true, but you wouldn't get the realistic level of ad placement in these cars without stickers. Or a truly outrageous price point 😛

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I guess it depends on the set. I got a similar F1 set recently, and while the reusability is indeed low, the specific parts give quite a nicer looking model.

For sets that you want to reuse for creativity, definitely agree.

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

In days gone collectors would have got diecast models instead. Which I know are still a thing, but Lego has largely supplanted