this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
765 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

71842 readers
4378 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds have apparently never met in person before, despite their pseudo-rivalry.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bobo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe true today, but less true in earlier times (90s and early 2000s) when Microsoft was really gaining dominance.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't think you remember how insanely terrible Windows was in the 90s.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

When I actually started doing hobby projects, I remembered that feeling with Windows 9x where you learn to avoid "wrong" actions which have a potential of hanging your PC. You don't even think about it. Just get used that you don't move the cursor after clicking there, you don't click here again after a first double click, and other such.

While things like editing config files were ... more normal for the average person even, you'd have a paper manual generally. For everything, kitchen appliances and anything technical you could buy too. You wouldn't expect everything to just work without reading it. Freezes and crashes were worse.

Windows won because most people didn't know of anything else.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

And it is still true today. Windows has the lion share of the market because we were raised with Windows and the vast majority of people don't want to learn a new OS.

[–] shroomato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not sure that the alternatives were any better, everything was terrible back then.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, probably not. But the idea that Windows won because of how great it was just doesn't hold up

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Luckily they learned from it and redesigned the kernel from scratch -- hold on, my producer's telling me that no, it's still the NT kernel under there. Outstanding.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Most users neither know nor care what that is.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

They might care when their os showing the same problems it did 30 years ago