this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
100 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

11450 readers
285 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That has always been my main criticism about wayland: it's actually vaporware.

It's just a spec (and not even a complete one) that says "now, you go do our work and implement all this". So everyone has to go and do their own thing, which is the usual big corpo strategy to kill small corpo and/or FOSS. So I wonder why don't people see it. Pulseaudio, wayland, systemd, all came in at about the same time as the "microsoftism" infection in Linux development.

From what I recall, for the first 5-or-so years there was not even a reference implementation (and I don't know if that is still the case, but do would expect it is).

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

I don't see how Wayland could be "antifoss." It is literally controlled by the major desktops. For smaller projects there are libraries that do the heavy lifting.

The major benefit is that the performance us much better since you don't have a bloated display server that has decades worth of bad code.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i think weston is the reference implementation, but i don't know if it's usable

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

It is "usable"

Not a great experience but it does work. Honestly I don't know why it exists at this point. It is holding back Wayland in a lot of cases and they are sluggish to implement anything.