this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
160 points (91.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

12471 readers
1778 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Appropriate! I'm actually a pro-2A gun owner who believes states should have licensee-paid training course requirements operated by ranges alongside properly funded per-gun licensing programs, both of which potential buyers would have to pass/obtain before use, perhaps additionally subsidized with a small annual fee per gun.

I definitely am guided in this opinion by the way I think we should regulate cars. Cars and guns are way more analogous to one another than hard-line advocates for either are usually comfortable admitting. I think that both have their place but need to be treated responsibly. The current lassiez-faire approach in most states is definitly a major factor in the number of deaths attributable to both. This doesn't mean it has to feel punitive or be needlessly difficult, it just has to comprehensively address obvious risk factors.

We largely agree. There's perhaps something to be said for the people who complain the gun licensing fees like this are mainly used to keep guns out of the hands of the poor, however.

As long as the licensing has a focus on competency, safety, and perhaps some kind of objective measure for mental health/civic mindedness/violent crime/appropriate red flags I can't define on the spot - rather than just fees that makes guns "for rich folk" I'm all for it.

Worst killing machines first, but I'm not opposed.