this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Sydney

1101 readers
17 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trk@aussie.zone 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We had storms, then we had supercells, then we had rain bombs... Now we have "bomb cyclones"...

Makes you wonder if its climate change, or just the race to find a new superlative.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is in the opening handful of paragraphs of the article:

When a low-pressure system transforms from non-existence to a formidable storm just a day later, meteorologists label it a "bomb cyclone", or a system that has experienced "bombogenesis".

The expression "bomb" is due to the explosive speed of development, however, its usage is restricted only to systems where the reduction in pressure exceeds a specific rate based on latitude.

[–] trk@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm sure it's a legitimate term, just like all the others. That doesn't lessen their glee at busting it out at every opportunity.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mate, they're meteorologists. Let them enjoy the tiny amount of excitement they have in their jobs.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

What about all the meteors though?