this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Sydney

1080 readers
11 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] trk@aussie.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We had storms, then we had supercells, then we had rain bombs... Now we have "bomb cyclones"...

Makes you wonder if its climate change, or just the race to find a new superlative.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is in the opening handful of paragraphs of the article:

When a low-pressure system transforms from non-existence to a formidable storm just a day later, meteorologists label it a "bomb cyclone", or a system that has experienced "bombogenesis".

The expression "bomb" is due to the explosive speed of development, however, its usage is restricted only to systems where the reduction in pressure exceeds a specific rate based on latitude.

[–] trk@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sure it's a legitimate term, just like all the others. That doesn't lessen their glee at busting it out at every opportunity.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mate, they're meteorologists. Let them enjoy the tiny amount of excitement they have in their jobs.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

What about all the meteors though?