469
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MrSangrief@lemmy.world to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev -4 points 1 year ago

No they aren't. There's no substantial proof for it, and the body of people who are behind this label (IARC) aren't even a food safety body. They once tried to say eating red meat is "possibly" cancer-causing as well.

[-] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

They once tried to say eating red meat is “possibly” cancer-causing as well.

Because it is. Whether the effect size is significant to you or not is one thing, but there is good evidence that it has a nonzero effect. Which is similarly the case here: there is evidence of effect of aspartame, but whether the effect size is significant is up to you to decide (or legislators).

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
469 points (93.3% liked)

World News

32326 readers
397 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS