this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
96 points (96.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

12764 readers
1295 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean.....I have no idea which side to take. The article gives me nothing to work with.

In general, I'm very fuck cars. However, what happened? Was she hit on the sidewalk? Was she crossing the road? Was she walking in the street instead of the sidewalk? Was the driver speeding? Did the driver run a red light? Was the driver drunk? Was the driver distracted by a cell phone? Was the woman jaywalking? Were there any visual obscurities?

All I know is that a 78 year old woman died after being hit by an SUV, which tells me nothing, and that the driver stayed on the scene, which tells me it wasn't intentional.

Outside of that, I can't make any logical conclusion on whether this article even belongs here. It might. I just have no way of knowing if the woman was at fault, the driver was at fault, or if the fact that it was an SUV was at fault. I don't know.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Welcome to the car apologia hour!

You realize that this is !fuckcars@lemmy.world and not !fuckcars@lemmynsfw.com right?

Does anyone? I had to check. I always have to check.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sometime i'm not sure whether fuckcars is for literally hating car or hating car-centric city planning. Sidebar says the latter, but people's behaviour says the former.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In practice it's for hating bikes and pedestrians and making up imaginary limits for what trains can do. But that's only in the comments.

Top level posts should adhere to side bar; the horror of car centric culture, design, etc.

And comments should be why we dont need to stop having cars we actually just need to go back to fdr new deal style cars but not quite that far because thay would be communist and ametica still had trains but like the 1960s or whatever. And also nobody in a car ever did anything wrong. And also one more lane would fix everything, but yes two would be excessive.