this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
980 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

8190 readers
943 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So why not skip the rent control and go straight to this?

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fair market value is much, much lower 9n rent controlled property

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, a government deliberately lowering property values so they can buy them cheap isn't a great precedent.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

Won't somebody think of Blackrock?

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not great, It's fantastic. Let the scumbags who own property they don't use lose money!

thale same strategy will be used to build more freeways through low income neighborhoods

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

To give the current owners the chance to do the right thing, and make a small but reasonable gain from their property.

And to make it more palatable to the general public. It's a lot easier to convince people to go along with it if you're seizing empty unused properties that are only empty and unused because the owner refuses to rent them if they're not making excessive profit.