this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
219 points (99.1% liked)

News

31170 readers
3812 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A pilot flying a Delta Air Lines regional jet on Friday apologized to his passengers after making a hard turn to avoid colliding with a US Air Force B-52 bomber, audio from the incident shows.

The incident occurred on SkyWest Flight 3788, which was operating as a Delta Connection flight, from Minneapolis, Minnesota, to Minot, North Dakota, SkyWest said in a statement.

The flight landed safely in Minot “after being cleared for approach by the tower but performed a go-around when another aircraft became visible in their flight path,” the statement read.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Kind of. It is more the same system, just some towers are operated by the military and some by the FAA. Each has their own airspace they are responsible for, but civilian aircraft can fly through airspace managed by military ATC and vice versa.

I'm not sure why it is like that nowadays. I guess in the beginning of ATC in the US it made sense for air bases to control the nearby airspace, and it probably just went from there, with maybe consolidation of towers as a cost-cutting measure along the way.

Caveat: it's been years since I've had to know any of this, so this might be outdated or misremembered.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So why didn't the military tower catch the helicopter in that DC crash? The FAA failed but the Army also failed? Two failures?

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've not read the report, but there'd only be one tower responsible for the airspace. Iirc, it was an FAA tower. What I heard happened was that the helicopter didn't follow the tower's instructions. But, again, I'm months out of date on that incident.

Imagine airspace like a tray of cookies baked too-close together. Some are bigger than others, some are weird shapes, some are sugar cookies, some are chocolate. But it's a tray full of cookie. There's only one cookie at each spot.

To stretch the metaphor further, imagine an ant walking across the tray. It's still only on one cookie at a time and it doesn't care if it's chocolate or sugar. At the edge of a cookie there's a handoff between cookies, where cookie A says "hey, cookie B, an Ant X is about to walk on you. Don't let them crash into any other ants, k? They're your responsibility now."

Anyways, I'm going to go let my caffeine kick in.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

lolwut? Cookies with ants on them. I just don't understand how there's a military ATC and a civilian ATC and they aren't sitting in the same room. They should be sitting in the same room.

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why would they sit in the same room? They're managing different airspace. There's over 250 towers, they can't all sit in the same room.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

OK, figuratively. From this it seems like there are two (more?) systems that are both sharing airspace that don't know what the other is doing. That's all I mean about "sitting in the same room". Mabye a zoom call?

You say "different airspace" but there's only one airspace. It's the one the planes are flying in.

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No, like I said, they're using the same systems, the same software, the same hardware. People at different towers talk to each other on the phone and on the radio, especially during handoffs between airspaces. The computers talk to each other. IIRC the information from one tower's radar is shared with other towers. They're not parallel systems, it's all the same system.

edit: I've been using "airspace" to mean "volume controlled by a tower". There's many airspaces.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

OK, I get it. There's FAA and then there's Air Force? Is there also Army and Marines and Navy? Why don't they all combine and make one super Voltron of airspace management?

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To quote myself

I’m not sure why it is like that nowadays. I guess in the beginning of ATC in the US it made sense for air bases to control the nearby airspace, and it probably just went from there, with maybe consolidation of towers as a cost-cutting measure along the way.

Also,

IIRC, the Army and Navy also operate their own ATC Yes, there is also Marine-run ATC.

Spitballing:

  • institutions don't like losing control
  • Many towers are located on military bases
  • military air traffic controllers need to learn the ropes someplace that isn't an aircraft carrier or active deployment
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I think I just want to drive or take a train now.