609
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 75 points 1 year ago

which the U.K. learnt the hard way, that you cannot negotiate with dictators. There can be no “peace in our time” with dictators hellbent on destruction.

If the UK is convinced that you can't negotiate with dictators, how does the UK keep entering into arms sales agreements with Saudi Arabia? Do the contracts just appear out of thin air at BAE?

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sigh.

I am referencing to a dictator that is hellbent on invasion of other countries. We had plenty of relations with Russia before they decided to invade Ukraine and they were a dictatorship before. We have plenty of relationships with China now and they are a de facto dictatorship.

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 86 points 1 year ago

The Saudis used their British weapons to bomb Yemen and create one of the worst humanitarian catastrophes in recent memory. The UK sold weapons to Saudi before, during, and after the Saudi involvement in Yemen.

Perhaps Russia should have merely bombed Ukraine to the point of starvation. Then they'd be a good dictatorship that the UK would be happy to carry out business negotiations with.

[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 69 points 1 year ago

Don't be ridiculous

Ukrainians are white

That's only acceptable when it's brown, asian, or south american people who's country you're destroying.

[-] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 32 points 1 year ago

Temporarily white mind you. They will be presented as unwashed asiatic slavic hordes soon enough by the western press, unfortunately.

Such trends and anti-ukranian xenophobia are already strongly devolping in Poland.

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one -4 points 1 year ago

What’s going on in Yemen is incredibly complicated. I’m not condoning everything Saudi Arabia is doing there, far from it, but to call it out as a good vs evil war is frankly a simpleton view. Saudi is bad there. Everyone is bad there. It’s a huge mess. But I think it’s important to recognise that the Saudis aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country, to prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

[-] HornyOnMain@hexbear.net 68 points 1 year ago

the Saudis aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country

hitler-detector

When I started reading this thread I really did not expect you to start defending Saudi Arabia to own the tankies ngl

[-] Flaps@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

They did say saudis bad tho, we should give the same nuance we expect from others. I don't suppose the commenter you're replying to supports Saudi arabia, it's just odd that the nuance they're seemingly willing to grant the saudis wont be given to Russia

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago

"Restored order" is such a bullshit line

That's basically the same line Russia is using in Ukraine. Just with some added "denazification" buzz words.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

No, Ukraine has a specific military campaign (the bombardment of Donbas) that he opposes along with the expansion of NATO. He has very clear demands, whatever you think of them.

That was initiated by pro-Russian insurgents and has led to lots of death on both sides. It's not like the opposing forces haven't been bombarding either. It's like if England started attacking the North during the US Civil War because they retaliated against the South attacking them, and of course they both speak English. I'm guessing you also believe in the Russian propaganda line about a genocide happening there, even though there's no proof? It was obviously just an excuse for Russia to get more control over Ukrainian territory after their Russian puppet President got ran out of the country.

Putin had denazification as a demand. That's not super clear at all. His clear demands are Ukraine staying out of NATO, which it was already up for agreeing to do, and surrendering territory, which is obviously the one it doesn't want to do, because no country would want to do that. That's the problem one but hopefully they come to something eventually.

It's bizarre to me that most hexbear users are less anti-war than some protestors and TV journalists that live in Russia itself who want their own country to leave. I agree with you guys on so many other stuff, but I can't get behind supporting the aggressor in a war, especially as they're shelling hospitals and apartment buildings.

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

The Donbas secessionists want to leave because the Maidan coup started pushing the country towards Ukrainian ethnonationalism, and eastern Ukraine is very Russian. Russia did back them, but Putin did not fabricate a popular opposition to the Maidan government.

Denazification is a pretty clear objective when the entity that you are seeking to denazify has battalions that are openly and explicitly Nazi as part of their doctrine. Purge those units, prosecute former members, ban Nazi hate crimes (like greasing bullets with pig fat) and ban Nazi symbols like Swastikas and Wolfsangles. It's really not difficult, the US military nearly passes that bar and even the German military does (though it has closeted Nazi cliques).

Ya but we're not in a war for our very lives. Hopefully they can get around to doing it after the war. Russia also had a Nazi problem with the Wagner group and a growing antisemitism problem but for some reason you can extend critical support to them but not Ukraine?

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

I was talking about Russia demanding it, not Ukraine doing it of their own volition. You are genuinely delusional if you think Ukraine is interested in such a thing. The Azov Battalion formed as a paramilitary circa 2014 to spearhead the aggression on Donbas, and since then became an official part of the military, still a couple years before the invasion, along with a few other explicitly Nazi groups. This, along with lionizing Bandera, pushing holodomor shit, and advancing ethnonationalist policy shows a clear trend. In terms of "state adoption of Nazi shit" Ukraine is easily the world leader and has been for some time, even over much worse and more destructive countries like the US.

Wagner is a PMC organization. There are Nazis in it, but it's not a doctrinally Nazi organization nor is it actually part of the Russian government like Azov is Ukraine. Russia likewise isn't pushing fascist hoaxes or ethnonationalist policies (however much we might both dislike Putin's revanchist rhetoric).

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What’s going on in Ukraine is incredibly complicated. I’m not condoning everything Russia is doing there, far from it, but to call it out as a good vs evil war is frankly a simpleton view. Russia is bad there. Everyone is bad there. It’s a huge mess. But I think it’s important to recognise that the Russians' aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country, to prevent American influence from growing and to suppress violent Neo-Nazi extremism.

[-] ToxicDivinity@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Every lib's real values: white people invaded=the good guys

Brown/Black people invaded=it's complicated us-foreign-policy

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Ahh that's why Russia used the Wagner group

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think sending a nazi-ish mercenarygroup into the meat grinder against an even more nazi-ish group so that they both wipe each other out (like what happened in Bahkmut) is good actually

[-] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 62 points 1 year ago

to prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

Lol, Iran is more moderate than Saudi Arabia and bombing and starving populations is how you create radicals.

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 57 points 1 year ago

And you think somehow the Ukraine situation is cut and dry?

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago

The NYT said that one is simple!

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

Ahh, well then, if they said so

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago

LIB s love doing the "its complicated... [handwaving about all sides are bad] ...so i support the US position" take

[-] Stylistillusional@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When it's the US/West doing something there's all this room for 'nuance' but when it is Bad Country it's suddenly clear-cut good vs evil.

[-] Flaps@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago

Incredible self-own

[-] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

Holy shit man just realize you have no ideology or clue, stop talking and educate yourself on what the actual fuck is going on in the world. It would be a far more productive use of your time.

[-] WittyProfileName2@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

But I think it’s important to recognise that the Saudis aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country, to prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

"Restoring order is when you bomb hospitals and exacerbate famines and the more people that die, the more order it is."

The Saudis are committing genocide in Yemen. No ifs, no buts. To claim they have a good reason to be out there doing it is genocide apologia.

the saudis make a desert and call it peace

[-] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

yeah the saudis are really worried about Islamic fundamentalism

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago

I am referencing to a dictator that is hellbent on invasion of other countries

Yemen isn't a country because it isn't white enough for you

[-] Bnova@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

You're not very smart.

[-] Gelamzer@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Ironic that you accuse others of reapting Kremlin talking points while vomiting the most generic pro Nato shit

[-] PaulSmackage@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

They get their opinions straight from the white house and brussels.

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
609 points (94.1% liked)

World News

32318 readers
762 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS