this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
498 points (97.9% liked)

News

31244 readers
4610 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Original article: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/13/us/indian-creek-surfside-billionaire-sewage.html

Without the paywall: https://archive.li/HrE38

Alternative: https://gizmodo.com/billionaire-island-where-bezos-lives-lobbies-state-gov-to-flush-its-poop-down-neighbor-towns-pipes-2000615795

Note

While the news is concerning, it seems Daily Galaxy had all the hallmarks of a content mill aping more legit sources. I had no idea because I follow a lot of RSS feeds and this had been sitting there for a while now. I choose it for the science stuff. Sorry. I honestly wasn't aware.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 107 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Here's the NYT article they're aping instead of checks notes whatever the fuck the "Daily Galaxy" is.

Why is every, like, sixth word bolded? Like I know pragmatically why, but it's so transparently designed for brainrotted zoomers who think 300 words is "long". What a slop trough of an article.

[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

NYT gets enough bribes for supporting genocide, etc. They can keep their paywall.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)
  • It's trivial to bypass the paywall.
  • The paywall is only there if you've already read a certain number of articles.
  • It's still a considerably better read than this telephone game version from the "Daily Galaxy". (Edit: reading it all the way, it's almost guaranteed written by an LLM.)
[–] tonytins@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I follow a lot of RSS feeds and added Daily Galaxy due to the science stuff. I wasn't aware.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 32 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

That's fair, and hopefully here I can give you something more concrete than just saying "wow dumb source lol".

  • The article is written by Arezki Amiri. This author puts out two or three articles per day on a very wide variety of topics, yet he lists no qualifications except: "expert specializing in health and technological innovations. He has extensive experience in sharing his knowledge on the impact of space technologies on health and science in general."
  • A ton of words are bolded with no rhyme or reason. Far from being something related to accessibility, this is done so your brain keeps seeing bolded text and subconsciously thinks "something important; better keep reading".
  • The article links to the Daily Galaxy at the words "sewage system" for absolutely no reason except for SEO. In this article about Bezos, it links to "1,300-Year-Old Royal Flush? Ancient Korean Palace Toilet Stuns Archaeologists!". When legitimate news sources do this, it's to enhance understanding; for example, a news outlet referencing an event from four years ago might link to one of their articles covering that topic for readers who may not be familiar.
  • The words in this article (and other articles of Amiri's) feel like they were at least assisted by an LLM. A big tell is that LLMs love to say "it's not X; it's Y". They also absolutely adore em-dashes.
    • "This isn’t just about sewage; it’s about how the wealthiest individuals [...]"
    • "This move wasn’t about being unreasonable; it was about fairness."
    • Other articles of theirs reek even worse.
  • Not a single one of their articles appears to be original reporting. It's always a summary of one source.

TL;DR: I'm 99% sure that every article from the "Daily Galaxy" is just taking an existing article (journal, news, etc.), running it through an LLM to summarize it, randomly adding bolds everywhere for atrophied, dopamine-starved zoomer brains, and published two to three times daily per author. It's a content mill.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 10 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Thanks for shedding light on this. Took them off my feeds.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

If it's any consolation, I can show you something similar to potentially swap in which actually is written by experts. The Conversation is always written by subject-matter experts (usually professors of the subject) and covers the same breadth of topics. The Conversation is basically what the Daily Galaxy wishes it were, and it's one of my favorite items on my feed.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Thanks. I actually follow those guys!

I should mention that around the time of tripping upon and posting this article, I did catch their post about US supposedly investing in a carbon capture machine pretty close by on my feed reader. It seemed oddly out of place given recent events. Not to mention combined with all the other niche or local outlets I follow, some of which are specifically about renewable technologies.

So, yeah, alarm bells were already ringing.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That’s an impressive deep dive.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

I could've looked at other authors' work, tried to find an editorial team, etc., but didn't think it was worthwhile. When you frequently write and cite sources in said writing, this type of investigation often becomes second nature.