this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
541 points (83.4% liked)

Comic Strips

18480 readers
2182 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Nope. It'll never work. Because when I walk into the voting booth, how do I KNOW FOR A VERIFIABLE FACT that this machine here in the booth with me is running the published software?

Computerized voting will always be a mistake.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The machine produces a physical paper record you can read, it doesn't matter what software it's running if you can verify your vote is accurate.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can you also verify that the vote it presents to be counted? Can you verify the counting? For every way to verify computerized voting, there are a dozen ways to compromise it.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They do hand-counts when there's an irregularity.

Hand count consists of 1 delegate from each party tallying every single ballet. If they disagree on a ballet (this is less common if a computer prints the ballet), an official agreed on by both parties determines what the voter intended.

The voting system is quite good by international standards, the fix in American "democracy" comes in way before all of this.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago

Computerized voting will always be a mistake.

disagrees in brazilian voting machine noises