Building an entirely new city from scratch in Northern California: an environmentally friendly way of providing more housing, according to some silicon valley types (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by maol@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sure, why attempt to improve the climate resilience or affordable housing in the cities where millions of people already live, when you can just buy land upstate and get a whole new toy to play with? And why tell local, state or national government anything - they'll only be supplying the land, water, sewerage, utilities & transport links. You pay your taxes, you deserve to get something back.

This is going to be one hell of a planning application. What's the land use code for "feudal stronghold"?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I particularly love the billionaires talking about space/Mars and colonizing it. Like that's somehow easier than lobbying for change and saving our already habitable planet.

[-] maol@awful.systems 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

no irritating residents groups on Mars. And no need for an environmental impact report. It really is quite close to early colonialism

load more comments (1 replies)

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023

52 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1401 readers

204 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems