World News

500 readers

373 users here now

Please help and contribute as we vote on rules:
https://quokk.au/post/21590

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

Deceptichum@quokk.au

Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com

PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au

372

'This is child trafficking' — Russia launches 'catalog' of Ukrainian children for adoption, sorted by eye and hair color (kyivindependent.com)

submitted 6 days ago by OutForARip@lemmy.ca to c/world@quokk.au

98 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bigboismith@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Russian media rarely if ever cites their sources, and when they do they are dubious at best

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago

and mostly because putin control what russian media puts out as well.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

These ones certainly aren't.
From the people who gave us the Ghost of Kiev and the Snake Island fantasy

[–] loudwhisper@infosec.pub 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Did they report on those at all?

I searched their websites and I got 0 hits on the Ghost of Kyiv, and 1 hit on Snake Island (this).

[+] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] loudwhisper@infosec.pub 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There is no such thing as "neutral" in a war, but facts are facts, and lies are lies. If the position people take means people say lies, you disprove the lies.

From all this word-soup I see that you have effectively not a good example of false reporting from the Kyiv Independent, and you cast a wide net to the whole "western media".

What is an example of neutral media in your opinion that you consider factual and trustworthy?

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I guess nothing since they ran away

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

thanks chat GPT
not intersted inyour wordsoup, bye

[–] loudwhisper@infosec.pub 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What a sad, almost patethic, way to drop the towel and abandon the conversation.

I can't say I am entirely surprised, when someone calls a newspaper a rag, accuses it of false reporting on two topics and then backpedals on "no, not that specifically, the whole western media is not neutral" (great discovery, newspapers are not neutral).

Have a good one!

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I gave facts and details explaining that rag was infested with NATO and other elements of the US terrorist regime.
Not to my surprise that comment gets removed by the .world censors.
And you have the nerve to call that a word salad.
Again, you are pathetic and not wasting my time on western imperialist and genocider enabling regime mouthpieces.
I'll block you since you can't STFU

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

"Removed by mod"

No reason given since it's pure censorship of facts they don't like.
pathetic cowards.
Worse than Reddit.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Perhaps something to do with you being Russian troll?