this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
937 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

73967 readers
3557 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 255 points 4 days ago (5 children)

There is something fundamentally fucked up in a country that arrests and puts in jail a 13 years old kid over a bad joke.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 129 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 52 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh I missed that bit. JFC she's 13. How can police be so clueless about their own job... rhetorical question, I know the answer.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

"clueless" thats pretty much what the leo jobs are.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 days ago

But can't put the pedo convicted felon grifter behind bars...

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 33 points 4 days ago

You don't understand, they are brown \s

[–] artyom@piefed.social 9 points 3 days ago

The result of "no tolerance policies".

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are schools not government organisations (in most cases) and would they not be subject to the first amendment?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The first amendment is not absolute - things like threats are not protected speech. Although I agree that in this instance there might be a case that her constitutional rights were violated, I suspect it would be dismissed as having been a justifiable action from the administration/police who "couldn't ignore a credible threat" or something equally bullshit...