this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
456 points (79.5% liked)

Technology

75103 readers
1979 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 411 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Just stick with Firefox and uBlock Origin.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Honest question, but what makes librewolf BETTER? In firefox you can easily toggle off the studies telemetry bullshit in the settings. Librewolf is just firefox with those things ripped out right?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In firefox you can easily toggle off the studies telemetry bullshit in the settings.

They're abusing the default and making privacy settings require user intervention rather than defaulting to the most private settings and allowing the option of opting in.

It's abusing consent, so people move to browsers where privacy is the default option.

[–] FalseTautology@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Blocking abp was the last straw for me, thank you for suggesting librewolf

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

This is what makes Librewolf better.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes. I consider it better because it's preconfigured for privacy, includes UBlock Origin by default, and rips Mozilla's telemetry out. So you never have to worry about them sneaking something new in a later update.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm more worried about the updates not happening in a timely fashion. Is it just a passion project by a handful of devs, or is there some kind of funding?

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Update frequency/latency hasn't been an issue in the 2 years I've been using it.

https://librewolf.net/#what-is-librewolf

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Sure, but what about in 2 years from now?

I used IronFox for a couple years and it suddenly stopped getting updates, and it took me a few months to realize and switch to something else. I don't want that to happen again.

I like the idea of librewolf, especially that it's just a patch set on top of Firefox, but someone needs to maintain that patch set. This would be fine for simpler software, but browsers are complex and I just worry that updates will stall out with little warning.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Certainly a valid concern, but it's true with any software. I think enough people (techies especially) are using LibreWolf that a lack of updates would be visible quickly.

Perhaps. But a browser is something I'd prefer to just forget about and not track updates. So it's very likely that I won't check if it has gotten updates for a few months.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Two years is enough time for Firefox itself to cease to exist. Cross that bridge when you burn it

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe? It's a lot less likely for FF to disappear than LibreWolf.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Agreed. But it's still too far of a timeframe to be worried about imo

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I've been using IronFox since it came out and I don't think it has been out for 2 years yet... are you thinking of Mull from which it was forked when DivestOS stop being maintained?

Also, I've been using Librewolf since its early days too, and their updates are always only 1 to 2 days behind an updated Firefox. I know cuz ai update daily on my Artix Linux machine and have both browsers. Whenever Firefox is updated its usually the same day or a day later that Librewolf is also updated to the same version number.

I get the concern, but honestly the Librewolf devs have proven themselves at keeping pace with the upstream for quite a few years now. Hopefully the Ironfox devs can do the same.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, mull. My bad. IronFox is the replacement that I'm using now.

And that's part of my point. Once my browser is installed, I don't really care about it, so I'm unlikely to notice it not receiving updates unless someone calls it out on SM or something.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

as I understand their build system is automatic. updates are not, but they have an update checker companion thing, and flathub too can manage that if you install from there

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m not a contributor to LibreWolf so I can’t speak with authority on it but I can’t imagine that they are so different from Firefox that they wouldn’t be able to just merge 99% of updates from FF with minimal effort.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

From looking at the repo, it looks like it's simply a set of patches that get applied to the Firefox source code. They don't maintain a fork, just a set of changes that get applied before building.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Librewolf doesn’t just block Mozilla telemetry, it also has an easy to understand default for cookies and privacy settings so someone who isn’t a computer expert can rely on the librewolf’s defaults to keep trackers from being able to build a profile on you.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

There's benefits to us not tweaking privacy settings. TOR explicitly discourages it. You don't (always) get fingerprinted by a single unique item, it's through an ensemble of data points that companies can identify who you are. There may be 10% of users with your same font library, and 1% who has the same monitor width, and 5% with the same time zone, and voila, when you multiply those percentages, you get close to one in a couple billion, and they've successfully fingerprinted you.

If everyone tweaks their settings from default Firefox, you reveal more information about yourself each time. You may think you're protecting yourself, but the reality is the opposite, you're creating a one of a kind browser config. This is where Librewolf can really reign supreme, if we all just use stock Librewolf, no one will be unique, and everyone will be anonymous.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I feel like I’m often getting new devices or reinstalling my OSes. I restart from scratch a lot. Going through the steps to harden Firefox becomes tedious. Librewolf starts from where I want to be.

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sadly i have to stop using it. Librewolf has start getting some graphic bug, i also can't upload pictures to some website (it show just lines). Now i'm trying Floorp.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is caused by not allowing the website to access your html canvas data. You can fix this in the address bar by clicking the icon on the left of the URL to grant permissions.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

To add to this.

This isn't a bug, it's a feature.

Canvas data gives a lot of datapoints that websites can use to fingerprint your browser. This allows them to track you across multiple sites even if you're blocking ads and pi-holing tracking services.

There is an unavoidable tradeoff between convenience and security/privacy. Privacy features are inherently less convenient than allowing everyone access to everything.

You could disable canvas blocking globally (I'm assuming, I haven't looked) and the problem would go away, but you've then weakened the privacy protections that were built in to the browser.

[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

As much as I like Librewolf as concept and ideology, I can't keep thinking that if there's a Firefox 0day, Firefox gets patched first, Librewolf later, and I'm potentially exposed for longer. That's why I prefer to stick with upstream.

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Have you noticed uBlock Origin being a bit hit and miss on YouTube lately? I’ve had it happen a few times lately where the video won’t play, or an ad comes up but doesn’t play. I’ve had to keep refreshing until it gets to normal where it just plays the damn video.

[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No. It works across all my systems. I never see ads on YT. However...

Videos not loading or playing delayed: That's a YT feature which they implemented for Firefox users, to annoy them. And to promote Chrome as "the fastest" webbrowser.

I also have dns issues at home... I should fix them already. Sometimes, a page doesn't load on the first try.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 20 points 1 month ago

You can try user agent switcher. Sometimes it is detected or causes issues, but if YouTube thinks you are running Chrome then you may get better service.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I experience the same issue. All the elements on the page load extremely slow or sometimes not at all.

[–] CyberSeeker@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I noted an experimental rule in uBO to address delays, but have not tried it yet myself.

Under settings, Filter lists, Built-in, uBlock filters - Experimental

Code has a comment:

! fake buffering on the initial load

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think youtube might have implemented something that prevents the server from delivering the video files until the expected duration of the ad has passed. This idea is completely unfounded, but this is what it feels like to me.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Maybe it is a regional thing? I was watching YouTube 30 mins ago with no issues and haven't ever had any unless I open a new tab but don't try to watch until the next day. Then I just need to refresh and it is off to the races.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 month ago

a b testing

or he needs to update his unlock

[–] elvith@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

Work PC and I have to use edge there with Ghostery (ugh). Was trying to find a decent coding tutorial. Every page load of a video was a playback error that instantly vanished when I hit reload. No problems on FF with uBO today, though.

[–] july@leminal.space 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What about the UI elements? Because they take a long time to load too

Thats fine for me. Just make sure to always "Reject all" on the cookies. If you accept then the whole site sometimes breaks for me.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I sometimes get a popup warning from YouTube that my account will be blocked from viewing videos if I keep running an ad blocker. But the warning goes away after a while and YouTube still works. I don't see ads except on mobile.

Oddly, they also keep begging me to "return" to YouTube Premium, though I have never paid for YouTube Premium.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Oddly, they also keep begging me to “return” to YouTube Premium, though I have never paid for YouTube Premium.

This is just 'normal' commercial psychological manipulation.

Returning sounds better than starting, so a small percentage of people would sign up that wouldn't have otherwise if it was worded accurately.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If on mobile, try setting it to desktop mode. Also, getting the chameleon extension and pretending you are using chrome can also help.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

I haven't had any issues like that, it's been working fine for me

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I use different shared PCs at work and this happens every time on the Windows 11 machines. Some ad plays before the video, but disappears when I refresh the page. This doesn't happen on the Win 10 machines we still have left. In forced to use Chrome there but everything has UBlock Lite enabled.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kepix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

dont give them solutions, they want to be angry