this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
594 points (96.6% liked)

Political Memes

9187 readers
4210 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Oh cool, that's totally a real and valid reason to embrace murdering as many people as possible.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What are you even arguing about.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Present situation bad" is not a fucking reason to advocate for the collapse of society, which literal millions of people will die in the course of.

I didn't realize that I had to fucking trace out that the collapse of society is bad, but I guess the OP was just too subtle.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Who's planning on murdering as many people as possible? Seems like someone writing a fantasy villain and not at all related to reality.

Trump defunding USAID will kill 14 million people. I call that murder.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thank you for confirming you have no fucking idea what happens when a society collapses.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People start murdering as many people as possible??? Is that what happens?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's the most high-casualty course of events possible under most circumstances, yes. Sorry that the ample evidence of the past 200 fucking years hasn't made that clear enough for you?

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is that true though? I mean I just did a mental review of collapses that came to mind and not even the USSR resulted in mass deaths? I mean the mass deaths were for causes the led to the collapse of the USSR but the actual collapse was not what caused the deaths.

Unless you mean that the new order that takes the place of the one before is the one that causes mass casualties because that does seem to be the usual case. No one actually falls in line with the ideology that wants to dominate, which I guess is your greater point.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 points 2 days ago

To be fair the USSR started with mass death and slaughter. Then continued in with it for some time. Strictly speaking the government never collapsed. Oh sure they loosened their grip on former forcefully conquered vassal States. But the bourgeoisie of the party didn't go anywhere. They simply gave up the pretense of sharing the means of production. And transition to outright owning them as proper bourgeoisie.

We shouldn't fool ourselves though. Russia is actually still slowly collapsing as are many governments. Hundreds of thousands of Russia's sons have been conscripted to fight for a fascist in their very own Vietnam. With a heavy death toll and no end in sight. As day by day the requirements for qualification to be conscripted are broadened. Putin literally just burning away a large chunk of their society. It's happening, just quietly now that there 4th estate in the US and globally has been captured and stripped bare at the altar of capitalism. Doesn't matter if it's east or west. Journalist are regularly fired, disappeared, or just slaughtered for doing their jobs

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Is that true though?

Somalia, Rwanda, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan (thrice), Sudan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, South Sudan, Yemen...

Yes. It's very true.

Ah my western bias is showing! You are right.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 days ago

Lets see those numbers!

[–] haungack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

OP just fyi but i think that somehow reducing the human population by 99.99%, leaving around a million or so, would not be the worst thing ever for hardcore environmentalism.

So however way society collapsed or for whatever reason, the ensueing starvation of billions due to collapsing fertilizer and fuel supply chains, is the fantasy.

spoiler/s
spoiler spoiler kinda :::