this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
44 points (100.0% liked)

WomensStuff

644 readers
452 users here now

Women only trans inclusive This is an inclusive community for all things women. Whether you're here for make up tips, feminism or just friendly chit chat, we've got you covered.

Rules…

  1. Women only… trans women are women, and transphobic or gender critical talk isn’t allowed. Anyone under the trans umbrella (e.g. non-binary, bigender, agender) is free to decide whether a women's community is a good fit for them.
  2. Don’t be a dick. No personal attacks, no aggression, play nice.
  3. Don’t hate on groups, hatefilled talk about groups is not allowed. Ever.
  4. No governmental politics, so no talk of Trump actions etc. We recommend Feminism@beehaw.org for that, but here is an escape from it.
  5. New accounts or users with few comments may have their posts removed to prevent spam and bad-faith participation.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Women are "the weaker sex". If you're living in a male-dominated world that just coincidentally happens to define "strength" by things that men happen to be good at.

But it turns out there's quite a few important ways in which women are the physically stronger sex…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Strong is a word, made up like all words, and has multiple meanings like most words.

If someone said "that person is so strong" you couldn't say without context if they mean that that person is physically strong or mentally strong. That sentence can apply to a person fighting cancer just as much as it can apply to a person fighting in the ring.

To me when someone says that a person is strong it does not immediately imply physical strength, so I don't think you are right about your position.

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It can have many meanings, in this context however the meaning is clear for everyone. This article is just clickbait for the sake of it. It's like Jordan Peterson in his "debates" "what do you mean by ....... ?"

You can indeed start a semantic discussion about every word, as language is very complex. But in some contexts, like "the stronger sex", everyone knows what it means. And i don't see any value in redefining it, rather than just being informative and saying "but strength of this type isn't everything, this is where the "weaker" sex excels".

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I just don't agree with you on the fact that "the stronger sex" is so cut and clear. But I understand your point.