this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
307 points (98.7% liked)

Privacy

40932 readers
1020 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It feel like we’re losing to Google, day by day. They aren’t killing AOSP directly, but they are making it useless step by step.

Now it’s Google Play Services, Play Integrity checks, installation source checks… more and more apps just refuse to run without GMS. Banking apps? Most of them don’t work. And it’s only getting worse. I run vanilla AOSP on my main profile, no Play Services. I keep GMS only in my work profile for the apps that absolutely need it. But now even some regular apps that don't need any play services won’t work on my main profile anymore. They simply block your from running , like le chat.

Maps is google's most important app there is no way to run without play services. Sure we can use webview or gmaps wv, but they don't provide turn-by-turn directions. Earlier maps used to work without play services, but two years ago, an update stopped it from working. Now that old version is out of date and no longer works.

Google is slowly making GMS very important to run. The problem with GMS is they require to run as system app and has to have all the permissions by default.

Hope EU puts pressure to make google allow apps to run independently without GMS or atleast install them as user apps(like graphene os sandboxed play services).

If we keep going on like this, AOSP can only run fdroid apps in the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (5 children)

You can stop using Google and Apple... It's that simple. But it seems that you, like many other, want their cake and eat it too...

[–] bier@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's different for every one, but for me it would mean, I can't use Microsoft authenticator, so I can't do my job anymore, as it is required to access my mail, teams, files, logging worked hours, etc etc.

I can't use any of my bank apps anymore, I can't use my phone anymore for paying in a store or checking in public transportation.

And many more apps that would stop working.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tell your employer to provide you a corpo phone.

You shouldn't be using personal device for anything related to your job imho

[–] bier@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do freelance work, so they would just tell me to get it myself. But I really don't want to have multiple phones. In don't use teams or mail on my phone anyway, only the authenticator apps (we have multiple).

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 day ago
[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some countries allow the corpos to lock your device down when you delete it, and they have collaborated with the providers to disallow Open Source OS alternatives like Lineage. The only way I know of is to get a Pixel, which is still owned by Google, and then I think only one provider allows the after market OS to function on network. For those of us entering a dictatorship gov, it really sucks.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, then there's a market for someone to crack...

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If only there was someone that could afford as much lobbying as Google and Apple, we would have another parasite that was just as bad. Lets just get CB radios. Maybe morse code. God, what a shit show. This country is so fucked.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I believe it depends more on people-power, than on their wealth. That's why they spend so much money on lobbying - it's a testament to how scared they are.

[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I dont know if that indicates that theyre scared, its just part of the maintenance cost of their empires

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't spend money on something that you don't get profit from. That's just plain logic. They know, if they don't keep spending money here, some politician would end their monopoly.

[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course. Im just saying i dont believe theyre scared because they know they will continue to have more than enough money for lobbying. Its probably very cheap in comparison to what they get out if it. Any business has necessary maintenance costs

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Any business has necessary maintenance costs"... Sure, but not every firm pays to manipulate and bribe politicians, to keep a monopoly.

[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Right, not every firm is a monopoly. Bribing politicians is a necessary maintenance cost of keeping a monopoly. We agree.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So, Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Adobe and so forth, is not monopolies?

[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Why? You think they don't do lobbying? Their cartels do constitute monopolies in my view

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So you think they are monopolies... Good - that's what they are.

[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)
[–] jafranz@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

Quite a comfortable way to do this is with grapheneOS. That really gives you a choice. Can't say much about each and every app, how they run. Although most of my usage hasn't changed much with grapheneOS as I changed from gsm-free custom ROMs. Works quite good with a nextcloud.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How it's possible to stop using google or apple? By doing it...

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

sure, am i supposed to live without a smartphone? at some point chasing privacy for the sake of itself just means i'll have a worse life.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So, do enlighten me, beside the fact that you are obviously addicted to the smartphone, how will your life be worse without privacy?

PS. Does anyone chase something for the sake of something else? That sounded a little silly...

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 24 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago)

surveillance capitalism already makes our lives worse. also who told you i'm using phones because i'm addicted, do you not use a phone?

PS: yes, that's why people do things at all.

[–] dropped_packet@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You have accurately identified a major part of the problem. Many people are unwilling to change their habits, or don't have the patience to learn new tools.

The other element though is time, many people don't have the time to stop and learn. Especially when a problem like privacy is a lot less immediate than hunger or healthcare.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

the monopoly has to be broken, living like luddites and chucking our phones or using pen and paper again for shit won't solve the issue.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

But the frustration among people are also growing, and that should be used/channeled to make a change.

[–] pathief@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure but what's a viable alternative for normies? It would be simple if a viable alternative existed. For normies, I reiterate.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's to do the grass root movement, and get enough to demand it, for a provider to feel the need to expand their customer base that way...

[–] pathief@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Normies don't care about that. They care about WhatsApp, Instagram and tiktoks.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Until they don't... and please don't call then normies, when they really are manipulated...

[–] pathief@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Normie is not an insult or derogatory. It just means "normal person", who is usually not very tech savy.

Most Normies don't care about privacy. They know, accept and are ok with their data being collected and sold in "free" services.

[–] Core_of_Arden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I don't agree. Most people I know, just don't know how it should be different...

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 day ago

The normie is the battle ground.

They need better info and they need to be hurt by corpos for change to heppen.

Uk age verification should see a bump in freedom enjoyer ranks