this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
507 points (94.9% liked)
Political Memes
9223 readers
3183 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Lol.
Okay, and you've admitted Lemmy as a (global) community has decided this usage of this verbiage. Problem solved, by your own metrics, this is the common usage here. Great, stop complaining then.
I get that you assert this, but that doesn't make it true. Most people pick up on the distinction, just like being told other distinctions.
Am I claiming this? Further, we all know what comparing and contrasting is. Just because there are comparisons, does not negate the contrasts.
And people are a mix of policies, no one is some purely liberal, rightwing, socialist, etc person. Policies can be grouped into various political ideologies, and people generally describe themselves as such given whatever they vibe with the most.
Read The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order - it literally addresses all of this and explains how capitalism has lead to "corporate monarchy"/"corporate fascism."
https://lemmy.world/post/34460101/18831918
Unless there's a variant of English called Lemmy English, Lemmy isn't a language community like a continent or nation with an active culture, organized society, etc. No one ceases to be a member of their language community by participating in Lemmy. It's a global site of discussion.
Only seen that here, which makes you the odd ones out.
The language community makes it true: the sources I linked & their sources support it. Plain observation of political news & discussions on US television, radio, & press corroborates. Are you denying the meaning of the phrase owning the libs in North America? Are you denying progressives there accept the label? Are you denying their pervasive language of liberals in opposition to the right?
articles using liberal as left
How One Oregon Activist Is Using a Decades-Old Liberal Policy to Stall Green Energy Projects in Rural Areas
The “weirdos” shaping Trump’s second term: A liberal writer explains her journey through intellectual MAGAland
Inside the “Private and Confidential” Conservative Group That Promises to “Crush Liberal Dominance”
Exploring Young Women's Leftward Expansion
U.S. Political Parties Historically Polarized Ideologically
Increase in Liberal Views Brings Ideological Parity on Social Issues
Conservative, liberal Midwest college students talk politics while practicing empathy
Republican legislatures look to put local issues in liberal areas under state control
Yes, right there. There's no "line": they're logically independent & can overlap. As stated several times before
Many would put personal freedom top among those pursuits & consider politics that treats it diminutively outright trash.
The denial that liberal is left is common in these discussions on lemmy: this post & its comments such as
Lol
You are the odd one out.
You are the very problem you describe and project.
Other online communities, especially European ones, understand this delineation.
Colloquial use vs jargon has been discussed.
Cultural is affected by the people in the culture. Communities by the people in the community.
Gee look, I was NOT claiming that. You said people have to be either/or - never said that. Learn to read.
Again, just because you can compare similarities, does not erase the contrasts/differences. We all learned to compare and contrast in middle school. Just because apples and oranges are both round and fruits, does not mean we should make apples and oranges mean the same thing or be the same word.
Please read The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order before responding again. It literally explains why liberals should be considered rightwing. That you don't understand is a you thing. Again, by your own claims, everyone else on Lemmy gets this but you. You are the thing you are complaining about via projection.
https://lemmy.world/post/34460101/18831918
I'll take major publications linked before (NPR, ProPublica, Gallup, Vox, etc) over Lemmy as less biased representations of conventions & conventional language.
This goes back to regional language differences & (Eurocentric) bias.
Not the same as a language community: no such thing as Lemmy English. This is still a discussion site of people from various regional language communities.
Now you're being obtuse & contradictory. Here it is a few more times.
as if you can draw a line between them in a Venn diagram indicating no overlap.
It's like talking about "the line" between color & shape: they're just independent concepts, there is no line.
Did it & read it back to you: own up to your own words.
I'm sorry this concept of regional language variations is so hard for you. Also, that logic or the idea of conjunction is too hard for you: liberal & left shouldn't be a hard concept, nor that left is usually understood with the word liberal in North America, nor that it's plainly observable in major publications shown to you.
Do you have as much trouble understanding something can have both color & shape and there is no "line" between them?
As was presented multiple times with basic logic, liberal can be left & doesn't imply right-wing (or left-wing). It takes bias & motivated reasoning to disregard the obvious.
Reading an argument that contradicts logic would be like reading an argument that true is false or 1+1=3. We could, but anyone with a basic grasp of logic already knows the claim has been refuted—no valid argument undoes that.
When your belief conflicts with logic & evidence, the reasonable course is to update belief. I suspect your thinking is too ideological to do that.
Okay, I accept you won't see eye to eye with me and have an obvious commitment to lying and misunderstanding. I and the rest of the Lemmy community will continue to use liberal and leftist this way. I think you are projecting a lot, to various boring and comedic effect.
“The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order: America and the World in the Free Market Era”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/05/06/how-neoliberal-order-triumphed-why-its-now-crumbling/
Imo the neoliberal order was a response to the Civil Rights Era, a WORLDWIDE movement that gave ordinary citizens more rights and power than any other time in history. To disempower them, capitalism was weaponized to create neoliberal policies to make poor people stay poor, without capital, and thus powerless.
https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/92993192-the-rise-and-fall-of-the-neoliberal-order-america-and-the-world-in-the
Capitalism has already killed us all. https://www.ecowatch.com/planetary-boundaries-ocean-acidification-climate-science.html
Murdering the entire planet's megafauna for capital is, well, not leftist.