this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
395 points (95.6% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

42083 readers
1238 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So if the only parties available result in decline, when does a party come along that wants to progress instead of stagnate or regress?

Time to grow up as a society and pull this baindaid off that we have apathetically suffered for our entire lives

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure, but we're not going to pull off the bandaid by continually voting in the party that is going to fuck us over fsstest. Is it not easier to work with a slow decline than a turbocharged rocket into the ground?

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If Democrats made meaningful change at the expense of their rich owners, which is what is required for most problems to improve, then their apathy wouldn't provoke people to also be apathetic.

Sorry but that's how it works

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This doesn't answer my question.

Do you think change will be easier to make when a party is in power that is slowly chipping away at your freedoms, or when a party is in place that is going to go full-tilt authoritarian and do as much damage in as little time as possible?

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Verifiable reality says no.

Neither of the halfs of the Duopoly are interested in making the necessary changes to improve people's lives unless those people are rich.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Make it make sense... You are telling me that citizens would have the same quality of life right now and no more to fight for than they currently do under the current administration, had Harris have won? I find that incredibly difficult to believe.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If Harris won then it's 4 more years of no tangible positive change, then the electorate becomes frustrated and votes in the Republican fascist. Republicans win because Dems fail to improve things.

You are operating in this weird idyllic neolib space where you think a party is their policies, in the real world a party is what they can actually accomplish.

And you don't seem to realize that when everything exclusively gets worse, and never better, every year, then people are not going to care how worse it gets. They will instead detach from the broken system where everything only gets worse.

I would have preferred Kamala by a ton, voted for her. But I'm not deluding myself into thinking she would make anything better, because that requires forcing her doners to lose money, and she won't do that, no Democrat will.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nah, it's just a modicum of critical thinking. "Would I rather have things stay the same, or maybe get slightly worse; or have things rocket to the bottom as fast as possible?"

To say the Democratic party is just as bad as the Republican party is so incredibly stupid. Like, look at the track record of the two and tell me that the dems have caused as much damage as the Republicans, or that on a global scale right-wing politics has brought about more positivity than left-wing politics.

I also don't see how it makes any sense to think "eh, things won't get better under any party, so I might as well vote for the worst. Surely this will bring about the changes I want!". Once again, we all die eventually so I guess we should just be aborting fetuses and staging mass suicide since I guess that's the same thing in the end and the path to get there seemingly doesn't matter.

I don't think Kamala would have made things better than they were, but I don't think anybody would. But I so think she would have made things significantly better than they are right now under Trump... But all those people trying to say "tHeYrE bOtH the SaMe" got what they wanted, and hopefully they're enjoying what they're getting. I certainly don't think they're anywhere near the same.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're living in a fantasy world where people are educated and informed.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, creating posts and content that suggest both side is only going to throw more people into the uneducated/uninformed bucket.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just supporting the rich Neoliberals, im sure one day they will throw the slaves a juicy bone.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

The problem is the massive gap between the two. Once again, advocating murder and mass suicide because "we all die eventually"

I'd much sooner advocate just living as much of a full life as you can, and doing what can be done to fight back.