this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
498 points (96.8% liked)
Funny
11164 readers
1231 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My guess would be that, beyond basically a thin plastic brick that makes noises and you make noises into them, to talk to another person...
Most of the functions of a modern smartphone rely on a high degree of lingusitic symbolic abstraction that only makes sense if it is stable and consistent.
Dream logic and dream perception is notably... basically the exact opposite of that.
You'll get very visceral feelings and sensations and visuals that... while yes, are abstractly tied to other things... my guess is that basically the part(s) of your brain that actually does interpretation of a complex system of symbols (writing)... basically, it isn't functioning coherently, the parts that all align to make that make sense when you are waking conscious, they're all being rerouted in a bunch of other ways while you're dreaming, to help produce other parts of the dream... or just... maybe defrag your memories and trauma?
I think a dumbphone, an old thing plugged into a wall... that is 'simple' enough to remain a somewhat coherent 'dream concept'... but a smartphone, an entire computer and all the things it can possibly do....just too complex.
My guess would be if people are dreaming of smartphones, the dream concieved smart phone is likely to be ... one or two uses cases, apps.
Somewhat interestingly... you can kind of see this in how earlier AI still motion and video generators... have that wierd dream like ... morphing, flowing aspect to them, the details are never right if you look closely, they really struggle with generating like, coherent billboards or signage or the text on posters or in a book.
It gets lost in the noise, ... and these models are basically oversimplified, rough models of neural networks... with way, way more amounts of processing power and a vastly more expansive data set thrown at them, to compensate for them being a crude approximation of the human brain, which is basically the most complex thing that is known to exist.
Maybe you could say that a dream is roughly a low fidelity hallucination, compared to the high fidelity hallucination that our waking consciouness is.
I wonder how synesthetics dream, how the deaf and the blind dream...
I still remember one powerful, psychadlelic trip I once had ... I was aware of the difference between the 2D image projection component of my vision, and the 3D spatial approximation component... because they were now massively out of sync... either the 2D image was basically delayed, or the 3d spatial component was just basically broken, getting sizes of and distances to objects and their edges massively wrong, sort of warbling, frothing, kind of like in a video game where LODs are flickering between high and low detail models erroneously.
... But, anyway, this is all my barely informed spitball speculation, I could be completely wrong, my non expert, layman brain is just trying to do abstract pattern recognition.
Totally!
I’m using my phone as an extension for hobbies, mostly as a map and fining things, and I’ve had it multiple times appear in my dreams.
Then again, as a Kid the N64 often appeared in dreams. I was playing some dream-Diddy Kong Racing even.
No, I am not schizophrenic. I do have hallucinations in the corner of my eye when tired, but they disappear once I look at them.
Its actually entirely normal for people to 'see things that aren't there' in the corners of your vision, especially in poor lighting conditions.
Your eyes and brain are best at resolving detail of things you're looking directly at, and basically the brain does a best guess pattern match for things on the periphery... because sometimes, its just a bug or a leaf or just a weird trick of the light... but other times, its a fucking stealthy predator animal.
As to video game ... entities appearing in dreams, or just... dreaming you are in a video game... yeah I've had that happen too.
It seems to be easier for a dreaming brain to just either mix the virtual world and real world together, I guess like AR... or just throw you totally in to a simulated world... than it would be to dream of yourself as still being you, sitting in a chair, in front of a screen, and keep the clear distinction between the real world and the digital.
Again I think the commonity here is that when a system of abstractions and symbols only makes any sense when it is stable and coherent... a dreaming brain does not really handle well a highly specific and complex rule set: it either blurs them together, simplifies them massively, or just doesn't include them.
EDIT:
But yeah, if you use a phone as mostly a map and compass... thats not too conceptually complicated, if you limit it to just that. Of course I'd be surprised if the... fidelity, the detail of the map and compass were high, but they probably don't need to be if most of the dream if like, you hiking around looking for geocaches or w/e.
Theres a whole lot more visceral, more real elements to that experience that are probably gonna get more ... dream fidelity focus? on? The environment, the difficulty of moving through terrain, the beauty or terror, maybe the elation of finding the thing, the determination that keeps you going, the fear of running out of food or maybe having to shelter in place from a sudden onset storm...
No, I was literally dreaming that I had a controller in my hands and was playing the game on a CRT TV lol
Edit: I was also sitting on the rattan char I always sat in
Well damn, that is surprising to me, I've not had a dream like that.
I wonder if anyone has attempted any studies on... how many people do and don't have dreams that do keep that conceptual divide intact.
EDIT: Could you make out the details of the game? Like... were you actually able to play it, and it... made sense?
As far as I remember it was a water level with a lot of metal, like a mixture of WaveRace and Banjo Kazooie, and I was playing as that yellow mouse and drove a plane. Then I lost and wanted to turn off the console but it didn’t lose power, so I unplugged it and it still ran on the tv. Then I got scared, and from that moment on I was scared of Tamagotchi and all of those electronics you couldn’t turn off
Huh.
Well, firstly, great nightmare, 10/10.
Secondly: A ... morphed blend of WaveRacer and Banjo Kazooie aesthetics that more or less adheres to the logic of a racing game...
Which isn't too fundamentally complicated, as compared to say... actually programming, or trying to play Dwarf Fortress or Factorio or RimWorld, the kinds of games that are highly dependant on specific technical details working in a consistent and stable framework.
Nonetheless, I am still impressed you had a dream that maintained the seperation between the 'real' and the 'virtual'.
Also... I think the actual n64 era kart style racing game was Diddy Kong racing, it just featured a good deal of Banjo Kazooie characters.
I don't think there ever was a Banjo Kazooie kart racing style game, named as such?
Nope! But banjo was a playable character in DiddyKong Racing