this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
18 points (95.0% liked)

Spaceflight

1597 readers
37 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Bimfred@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

As opposed to Blue Origin's solution, which was to be assembled from three different spacecraft in orbit? Or the Dynetics solution, which was over its own mass budget?

[โ€“] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

It's wild that the crazy overbuilt and overcomplicated SpaceX lander is the best option.

The Blue Origin lander, which won the 2nd place consolation contract, changed to be more like Starship than their original 3-part proposal. They also rely on orbital refueling now.

I wish Dynetics could have made their mass margins work. I liked the size and shape of that lander.