No? That's not what I said. I'm assuming here that you are engaging in good faith, though I'm genuinely puzzled how you can continue to draw the conclusions you seem to have drawn from reading what I wrote above.

What I did say is that the people posting content without getting compensated for it are more likely to be doing it out of pure passion. The people posting on corporate platforms who also refuse to post on open platforms are doing it primarily for the money. They undeniably are less passionate about their content because of that. If they were as passionate as the first group, then they'd also be uploading to open platforms because it would be more important to them to get the content shared than to be guaranteed revenue from every single platform.

I also said that the people who are posting content on open platforms without any promise of revenue are more in need of donations than people posting solely on corporate platforms that have a revenue model rewarding creators. The latter group is already getting compensated by their corporate sponsors and ads. The former are not being paid on the open platforms, and need viewer donations far more because of that. I can't see how any of this is controversial in any way. Artists deserve to be compensated for their work, most especially when they openly give their work into the commons.