this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
291 points (89.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34164 readers
1851 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I personally cringe when I hear a friend js having a kid. All I can think of is how bad theyre going to have it. Hell id definitely have been better off being born 20 years earlier, but these new kids are REALLY screwed unless they have super rich parents.

"Nothing new under the sun" I suppose!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Feyd@programming.dev 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

IMO climate change is kind of a different beast than hardships from the past.

[–] Doublenut@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

This mostly but also a lot of that support that's available today is being stripped away.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Tell it to the young American men who were drafted into the Vietnam War, and were dead 3 months after receiving their notices to report.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

I am quite certain they would be happy to hear that their friends and family back home continued to live on past them.

Climate change is the sort of existential threat that will literally kill every single person you've ever met. It is not the same. If I could volunteer to give my own life to reverse catastrophic climate change it wouldn't even be a question. But no matter how many of us go and die about it we are now past the point where we can make a difference. The ice caps are in runaway melt loops. This is now a self perpetuating problem that cannot be solved without some new major scientific breakthrough. Habitable portions of the earth are going to shrink to single digit percentages of what we have right now, over the next couple hundred years. We can no longer stop this from happening, and it all happened because some of the very worst parts of humanity decided they needed a few extra thousand dollars every year.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Your point? Climate change has the potential to affect every living thing on the planet. Even the horrors of world war 2 didn't have that kind of reach. Additionally, humans eventually have to stop fighting when enough of them are dead. Climate change is a threat that humanity can unleash but be potentially unable to stop. Like I said, a different kind of beast.

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That is a very Americentric viewpoint. People are getting killed in wars as we speak, in fact more people are getting killed in wars as we speak than did in the 1960s.

They did not have climate change to worry about though, because they were blissfully unaware of that fact.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Slow and steady boil vs a quick(er) release.
Not the best way to die of course, but I'd choose the quick path if given the choice.

But the path to the end is littered with grief on both ways just spread more and in a different way.