Today I Learned
What did you learn today? Share it with us!
We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.
** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**
Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
Partnered Communities
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
Community Moderation
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
view the rest of the comments
It’s extremely narcissistic no? To be that close with a machine that just constantly panders to you and where every conversation is about you?
I... don't think thats the best explanation.
I've been feeling lonely myself lately.
I can see how an app that just says nice things to you could be a kind of salve.
In the same way that watching porn can fulfil a very human need, I think a chat bot can also do that.
I guess it can be a machine designed to stimulate specific emotions.
The entshitification of relationships?
Good, less narcissistics in the dating pool?
I can agree with you to an extent. But would you say the same thing about a dude and his fleshlight?
I don't think people form emotional connections like this with their fleshlights or dildos, and I don't think those sex toys have the same insidious yes-man programming; but - if somebody did form an emotional connection like this to their sex toy - then yes, I'd suggest it is unhealthy.
The narcissism that I suspect the person you're replying to was pointing at is specifically in the way these bots pander, agree with, and fall over themselves to confirm everything about you. I don't know if I'd call liking that kind of thing narcissism personally, but I can see what they mean. Either way, it's not something sex toys really offer in the same way as they've typically got a different "function"
Thanks for responding.
Having said that, why are sex toys different in function?
Well, their uses are different, to put it simply, and the way they are typically sold is different.
I'm not going to ask a fleshlight to generate C++ code for me because it's not going to. I wouldn't try to get physical stimulation using a chatbot. The functions of these chatbots, and sex toys, are different in a lot of ways.
However, they are similar in others. One of the functions for both of these things (chatbots and sex toys) is to make the people who produce them money.
Sex toys typically are a one-time purchase. The money is made there, so to get the money from the customer, the manufacturer only needs to convince you to buy it once. Whether you enjoy it after that doesn't matter to the manufacturer unless maybe you return it and it gets a bad reputation. For a sex toy to be successful, it generally has to satisfy customers in more of a physical sensation sense - relatively straightforward, not requiring too much psychological manipulation.
Chatbots are a subscription service, so the manufacturer needs to convince you to buy it every single month (or week or year, whatever the billing period is). This means the manufacturer needs to convince you every time you interact, and the manufacturer wants to keep you interacting too. Because these bots are programmed to be conversational, they can manipulate you to feel good (and to feel good about the bot, and about buying a subscription for another month) by agreeing with everything you say, validating all your opinions, and providing platitudes when you feel sad.
And that's just one example of how these two things differ. For another insidious function of chatbots that's quite closely tied to the emotional "validation" they provide their customers, look to their ability to collect data and build profiles of customers that their manufacturers can sell to other companies or use to advertise. This also gives the manufacturers an incentive to make the bots make personal, emotional connections with people, to elicit personal (a.k.a. more valuable) information from them.
If they're forming a relationship with an inanimate object? Yah, that's arguably even more concerning.
But concern wasn't OP's point. It was narcissism. That a person uses a machine solely to satisfy their needs and their needs only. Is that narcissistic?
Which need is satistied is important here. Sexual gratification is not the same as an apparent need to interact with someone who affirms everything you tell it to, basically acting as a personality mirror. And then falling in love with something that echoes your every thought does have a semblance of narcissism involved.
Taking the dildo metaphor: having a dildo isn't narcissistic. Being a dude and having a dildo molded after your own dick and exclusively using that as it's "the best thing ever", does seem a bit narcissistic, no?
Or a woman with a dildo?
Everyone uses dildos.
Yup, I was going to write this, actually. But a man and his fleshlight gets the point more across here in Lemmy.