this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
804 points (97.1% liked)

Progressive Politics

3128 readers
1225 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no corroborating sources when linking them would have been trivial

You settled nothing. Why should anyone take anyone's word on here for it?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I am under no obligation to prove that the sky is blue to someone who will hear all my patient explanations of Rayleigh scattering and just be like "nope. red."

They had debates. They're still out there. Just pick one. Maybe the ABC one where it was clear that George Stephanopolous was still the Clintons' press secretary.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

No one has to care about lazy words lacking substance of corroboration.

Again, you settled nothing besides showing lack of will to settle anything.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

No one has to care about lazy words lacking substance of corroboration.

Like your idiotic and ridiculous lie that Clinton supported the public option and Obama didn't. You never even attempted to back that up. Yet somehow I have to entertain your deliberate attempts to waste my time by demanding news articles from 16 years ago that you already intend to dismiss without reading.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Like your idiotic and ridiculous lie that Clinton supported the public option and Obama didn’t.

Who do you think you're replying to? Do you observe commenter names?

I'm just calling out lazy unwillingness around here to link to corroborating sources (easy & common sense for settling an argument) to instead sling words like petty, incompetent bitches. I don't think I'm alone in not recalling the exact nuances of healthcare proposals candidates had in 2008.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

I’m just calling out lazy unwillingness around here to link to corroborating sources

Oh, sorry. I thought you were the initial liar, not a toady for the initial liar. You want sources from me but not them. Convenient.