this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

5356 readers
314 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't know why we couldn't have what we already have on mobile. My kids phones have isp enforced restrictions that prevent them stumbling onto most adult sites. At home I've got their devices fairly locked down but I'm fairly technical so know how it works. I don't know why households couldn't just have a setting with their ISP that allows them to opt in/out of blocking non-OSA compliment sites rather than doing a blanket censorship.

I get the reasoning behind the OSA - a lot of parents don't know how to protect their kids online and defer to the government to sort it out. However the implementation has been a giant flustercuck.

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Because it's not about the kids.

The UK, or any government, could instead use the money for OSA to create a protocol/mandate that phone and net providers need to adhere to, which enables parents to restrict to adult content. Heck, phone-only sims and adult traffic control administered via "parent accounts" would deal with almost the entire problem seeing how most young people use phones for internet access anyways instead of laptops and desktops.

But it's not about the kids. It's about control and having an excuse to abolish privacy.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago

Sir, I will refer you to my previous reply.

LOL wut you expect me to actually parent My children? LOL gtfo. All I care about is sourdough and designer dogs. Let the government do it!

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

You can still Google image search "tits". The OSA doesn't stop that.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 week ago

I don't know why households couldn't just have a setting with their ISP that allows them to opt in/out of blocking non-OSA compliment sites rather than doing a blanket censorship.

Yes. I would rather have feds and corpos control what my kids can and can't access.

We really are headed into two tier society... People who take digital sovereignty seriously and the useful idiot slaves